Traditional approach to sexual ethics is being challenged in major churches.

Primary tabs

Text transcribed from original caption.


For further info, pls. see Wk in Rel


PHOTO NUMBER:


PC-53526


Suggested for use with:


WEEK IN RELIGION 4/18/80


TRADITIONAL APPROACH TO SEXUAL ETHICS


IS BEING CHALLENGED IN MAJOR CHURCHES


Artist Joe Giacalone's cartoon, above, and its


humorous punchline, suggest the intense concern among Christians


for the complicated matter of human sexuality.


As churches continue to search for an answer to the question of whether


sexual practice is inherently sinful, the study panels of several


denominations have concluded that it is more appropriate to focus on


human relationships than in universal rules dealing with these concerns.


A task force of the United Church of God of Canada has aroused controversy


over its "contextual" recommendations, soon to be submitted to the church's


general council, in which it states: "That sexual intercourse may be right


for singles under certain circumstances; 'mature, self-accepting


homosexuals' should be admitted to the ministry; the church should stress


'intention to faithfulness' rather than 'sexual exclusivity' within


marriage and masturbation as a normal part of human sexuality." The


report urges that all sexual relationships be viewed in the light of


four criteria: "Are they creative and liberating? Are they mutually


supportive? Are they socially responsible? Are they joyous?"


In many ways, the Canadian task force document is similar to a disputed


1977 report by a commission of the Catholic Theological Society of


America. The commission, which included two priests, two laymen and a


nun, suggested that human sexuality be viewed from "personalist"


criteria, rather than an objective approach that categorizes certain


actions as "intrinsically evil." Their report, Human Sexuality,


published by Paulist Press, upholds the principle that "wholesome human


sexuality is that which fosters a creative growth toward integration."


The authors maintain that this is the standard against which acts


such as contraception, masturbation, pre-marital sex, adultery,


homosexuality, fornication, sodomy or bestiality --formerly held to be


"intrinsically evil" -- should be measured.


The doctrinal committee of the U.S. Catholic bishops denounced the


conclusions as "pastorally dangerous and contradictory to theological


tradition," and the Vatican's Congregation for the Doctrine of the


Faith reprimanded the authors "for the erroneous conclusions and the


potentially harmful impact these ideas can have on the correct formation


of the Christian conscience of so many people." In 1975, the traditional


Catholic Church's position had been reaffirmed by the Vatican Declaration


on Sexual Ethics -- which declared that "all extra-marital sex,


masturbation and homosexual acts are objectively evil in and of


themselves."


Other church bodies have indicated possible changes in their approaches to


human sexuality. A British Methodist panel concluded last year that


"Christian morality cannot be expressed in terms of approval or


disapproval of particular acts considered in isolation from the


circumstances in which they are performed and the persons who perform


them," and a proposed position paper of the American Lutheran Church --


while maintaining its traditional stand on most sexual practices -- admits


that the church has been guilty of much that is anti-sexual.


As churches apply the teachings of Bible, scholarship and scientific


research to their positions on human sexuality, they are facing the old


question of whether they can update traditional approaches without


compromising basic doctrines. On one point, however, both


conservatives and liberals seem to agree -- it is vitally important


for the church to address the issue.


Credit Must Read:


RELIGIOUS NEWS SERVICE PHOTO


(Reproduction Rights Not Transferable) (CF-NY-4A-80-JH)


Page: of 2

Bookmark

BookBags: