Interview of William P. Lytle by Lois Boyd and R.D. Brackenridge, side 4.

Primary tabs

Download

  • speaker
    With a line at Lois's question, as a
  • speaker
    historian I've studied many different General Assembly records. You look back and you look
  • speaker
    over the minutes. You look at the issues and they've got a big space to, let's say the
  • speaker
    Princeton trial. So you assume the church thought only about the Princeton trial all year is important. Y
  • speaker
    our General Assembly, I think, most people will remember
  • speaker
    that as the homosexual Assembly. If you were trying to say, I think,  what what
  • speaker
    was it about this year, that you think, really really would
  • speaker
    characterize the assembly in the year, as you see it. Would you be able to put
  • speaker
    any words on that? I know. I know we've talked about lot of specific things
  • speaker
    but is there anything that you really think that that Assembly showed about
  • speaker
    the church? Or where you think church is?
  • speaker
    I suppose I would. I would say that it was. Again,
  • speaker
    the church's desire was shown to
  • speaker
    be about its business of mission. That
  • speaker
    probably was the real highlight. Probably one of the
  • speaker
    reasons that I would like it is not the reason I liked it was because I was a missionary. Because
  • speaker
    I represent a certain stream within the
  • speaker
    life and history of the Presbyterian Church, that speaks of the church's outreach. For
  • speaker
    a time, the church has been involved in its
  • speaker
    own internal meshing. The question of ordination
  • speaker
    itself was one which involved a good deal
  • speaker
    of real, intense struggling
  • speaker
    against internal relations. I
  • speaker
    think that the year itself is a year that
  • speaker
    expressed the church's desire ,not necessarily to forget that
  • speaker
    but, to go beyond it in again its expression
  • speaker
    and desire to be reaching out. In it's
  • speaker
    reaching out again,
  • speaker
    it sees that you get hurt. And, you take risks. And, the whole
  • speaker
    Africa situation is one of the illustrations of that. A lot of
  • speaker
    the questions of how we reach out in our own country still are yet to be done,
  • speaker
    to be finally decided upon. But the issue, or
  • speaker
    the program itself that reflects what I'm talking about is the Major Mission Fund, which again
  • speaker
    got major emphasis this last year. This was the year that
  • speaker
    hundred and nineteen presbyteries were involved in the Major Mission Fund. And
  • speaker
    that, itself was one of the real characteristics of the year,
  • speaker
    I feel that. There was a lot of emphasis across the church on what are we about? What do we do
  • speaker
    in the way of mission, both at home and abroad?
  • speaker
    Hopefully I'd say 10 years from now, people would look back and
  • speaker
    see this year as a year when indeed the church began again to
  • speaker
    set its focus in that direction.
  • speaker
    We haven't begun to around that. I was thinking of this what you're saying in
  • speaker
    terms of the general context of what some of the writers are calling this new evangelicalism that
  • speaker
    seems to be
  • speaker
    permeating, not just the Presbyterian Church, but. More or less what
  • speaker
    you're describing  is a sense of concern about the social issues and everything, but still realizing there is something
  • speaker
    beyond this, and
  • speaker
    recalling the church to something that for a while has been outdated. We have seen that we have been outdated. T
  • speaker
    hat's right.
  • speaker
    We are an evangelical church. I guess if there's one thing that impresses a
  • speaker
    person who travels around the churches, that the Presbyterians are evangelical lot. At the roots,
  • speaker
    that's who we are.
  • speaker
    And in a sense I was asked early on, you know, about this business about being
  • speaker
    conservative, evangelical, or something like that. And, I made that response, "Well, I'm both."
  • speaker
    I hate to give up terms anyway. Anybody I don't like to use terminology that
  • speaker
    I. My own background is a conservative background.
  • speaker
    And if you're talking about theology, I'm.  I'm a conservative when it comes to theology. And so does. The Presbyterian Church is. O
  • speaker
    ur seminaries are. They're. We are. We're conservative.
  • speaker
    We are evangelical. We are. We are a we are a church
  • speaker
    that believes in the centrality of Jesus
  • speaker
    Christ in life with us.
  • speaker
    And at the same time it is that the very thing that in the history of the church has driven us
  • speaker
    beyond the walls of the church out into the world where we believe Christ is Lord.
  • speaker
    So as far as I'm concerned, the closer we can get to our conservative evangelical roots,
  • speaker
    the more liberal, the more concerned, the more socially active, we will be.
  • speaker
    And so that that's part of what I meant when I said that
  • speaker
    the whole issue of the homosexual question has been one that has,
  • speaker
    in retrospect, served to advance
  • speaker
    the church because of its really forcing us back to some roots that
  • speaker
    are going to force us out. So I would like to think that that's what
  • speaker
    has been happening over this past year and it's going to be continuing to happen in the church in
  • speaker
    years to come.
  • speaker
    Maybe we ought to stop for the day. I hate to because we still have many things to. This is so much time to do this.
  • speaker
    I know that we are going to listen to this. And,  maybe there will be some other things. Well that's really been a.

Bookmark

BookBags: