You are here
Board of National Missions miners hospitals discussions, April 1963, tape 7.
Primary tabs
Download
- speaker[Rogers, Lon B.] Now the Ford Foundation survey
- speakersaid that the Southern Appalachian area eight states one hundred ninety candidates
- speakeris the most depressed area in the United States I'm not proud of this. I'm
- speakersorry for it but I live there and I want to do something about it. If it is the
- speakermost depressed area in the United States, and this Board has adopted it as a major policy of
- speakerconcern, what do what can we say to people in other parts of the
- speakerworld if we can't resolve some of these problems in southern Appalachia?
- speakerIf this is the most depressed region, and we can't solve our own problems, why are we going to
- speakerAfrica and other parts of the world trying to solve some of their problems?
- speakerI say let's try to do this. Now what are you being asked to do? Not to build
- speakerhospitals.
- speakerYou're not being asked for a blank check. You're being asked only to be the
- speakervehicle, the corporate vehicle, through which these
- speakerhospitals can pass from the union hands which
- speakerhas turned its backs on these people. And when, if they close, and if we don't take them,
- speakerthen a lot of these people are going to be without hospitalization. I can tell you. I live there. I've been
- speakerover every in every county in eastern Kentucky, not once but many times.
- speakerDr Rosenfeld [Rosenfeld, Eugene D.] has brought out a play in which the dean of the U.K. Medical School [Willard, William R.] says it's
- speakerfine. I believe that the governor of
- speakerKentucky [Combs, Bert T.] will do what he says he will. If he doesn't, you are not
- speakerbound. You got an out. He said I will, I will
- speakerrecommend to the General Assembly of the Commonwealth of Kentucky soon as we get this primary out of the way.
- speakerAnd he's got a man that he's trying to nominate to succeed him, who will carry out his policies.
- speakerAnd, I pray that he will get the nomination. Ed Breathitt. He says
- speakerhe said I will recommend to the General Assembly, of course as he said, it's a
- speakerDemocratic General Assembly for the most part. Another irony is that one of the
- speakerRepublican senators is from Harlan County. He also called this to the attention of the
- speakerBoard. Nick Johnson [Johnson, H. Nick], he's quite a character. He's been thrown in
- speakerjail for doing a lot of things he oughtn't be. And, he's tried to threaten to sue the state. Isn't it
- speakerwonderful how the Lord does, works his wonderful works
- speakerthrough people. Sometimes we think they are the very devil themselves. And, I guess,
- speakersometimes they think I am. Nobody asked
- speakerme up here how I stood about this thing until I met Ken [Neigh, Kenneth Glenn] on the hall the first day I came.
- speakerI said, "Ken, as of now, I'm opposed to it."
- speakerWhat changed me?
- speakerI got in a conference with Bill Hudnut [Hudnut, William H., Jr.] and my Synod Executive, Corbett [Corbett, Gordon Leroy] back here the other
- speakerafternoon for two hours. And, Gordon told me what had happened. I didn't know. This
- speakerdeadline the Union has imposed, I think is criminal, but they have
- speakerimposed it. They've set it up. Now,
- speakerthis is the time limit was it was impossible, but we have to live with it.
- speakerCorbett [Corbett, Gordon Leroy] said, "We've got the money for the promise by candidate. If he doesn't deliver.
- speakerYou've got no obligation. The governor of Kentucky doesn't deliver. You've got no obligation."
- speakerBut, you've got to do some things in faith, my friends, and if the Christian
- speakerreligion doesn't teach failure, it doesn't teach anything. And God works only
- speakerthrough people, Time up?
- speakerWell, my heart's in this
- speakerin this thing, people. I believe that that it is in the interest
- speakerof eastern Kentucky. I believe it's in the interest of the United States
- speakerto provide hospitalisation for these people. I believe that if this Board does
- speakernot act as the vehicle through which this transfer of hospitals from Union to private
- speakerownership can be affected, these people, two hundred and
- speakerseventy eight thousand people in eleven counties of eastern Kentucky, will
- speakerbe bereft of adequate medical services.
- speakerYou can't always go, Doctor,[Heydinger, David K.] to the University of Kentucky Medical Center for an
- speakerappendectomy if you have an emergency. That's the way it used to be, and people would die on the way.
- speakerThere's terrific need, my friends. And, if if we're not going to be the
- speakerLevite and walk on the other side of the street, we can't afford not to face up to some of these
- speakerproblems. I grant you the right expression of your
- speakerwill, but I pray that it may be God's will,
- speakerthat we be the vehicle through which hospitalization is maintained
- speakerin a very needed area of eastern Kentucky and southern Appalachia. Thank you
- speakerfor your time. [Rogers concludes]
- speaker[Barrie, Bob] I think we should
- speakerimmediately ask Dr. Neigh [Neigh, Kenneth Glenn] if he will speak to [Neigh] I don't know if anybody wants to hear me.
- speakerThis case. Beg pardon? Where you stand
- speakerright. Where I stand? Mindful, speak your mind loud and clear
- speakerYeah we're all of us have, from one time or another,said
- speakerwe had hoped that the doors would be closed, at one time or the other.
- speakerOne of my friends last night said to me, don't feel too badly if
- speakerthe door is closed today. The door is closed today.
- speakerI think I can state my position probably in one sentence. That door is
- speakerclosed today. It has been closed on my conscience.
- speakerNow, all, all this seems to be general agreement
- speakerhere on the surface that the financial aspects of this thing
- speakercan be cared for. It centers around the
- speakerimpossibility of doing it. I say on the surface.
- speakerIt appears that the questions
- speakerconcerning the financial aspects have been answered. And, that there is
- speakeran agreement. By this, I do not mean there is an agreement
- speakerwith the way in which the financial aspects of the thing are going to be solved.
- speakerAnd this is a matter of philosophy, personal philosophy,
- speakerwhich one has to measure against his idea of God and service.
- speakerAnd, it is exactly point, where I've been forced to
- speakermeasure myself. I agree
- speakercompletely with Dave Heydinger in terms of the impossibility of this thing.
- speakerPerhaps it doesn't frighten me as much as it does others because somehow
- speakeror other, I've been jousting with impossibility all my life.
- speakerKeith [Conning, John Keith G.] and I went to Detroit at the same time.
- speakerKeith had the most of the ramshackle beat up old place you ever saw.
- speakerNo people. A community that was torn by the worst kind of strife that you can
- speakerimagine. I wouldn't have given a nickel for his chances there. And,
- speakerhe did it. Last week I was out for the groundbreaking
- speakerGroundbreaking of a church in Dearborn. I'd happened to be there
- speakerfive years before when Jack Mitchell [Mitchell, John K.] proposed the
- speakermillion and a half building program. It was a real hot one.
- speakerJack and I've talked about it, I said Jack you don't have a chance.
- speakerA chance to do that. Yet, last week
- speakerthe ground was broken for that church. The Board of National Missions did its best
- speakeras always jousting with impossibility. And, that is what we're up against
- speakertoday. Another thing I think you ought to know
- speakerthe whole
- speakerObviously I'm not an honest doctor.
- speakerI am. I am an administrator. I hope.
- speakerand I think I would like to recite just a bit of a history of
- speakerthis thing in the last two weeks that implement
- speakermy belief and accomplishing the impossible.
- speakerOn April the twelfth,
- speakeraccording to my figures, that's about two weeks ago.
- speakerWe had an appointment with
- speakerthe officers of the Fund.
- speakerIt was an interesting meeting. I come from the coal
- speakercountry, too, Lon [Rogers, Lon B.] , over in Ohio.
- speakerMy roommate in college was a miner, oh operated. His father operated
- speakermines in western Kentucky and eastern Ohio. My other roommate
- speakerwas the president of one of the divisions of the miners' union. So I
- speakeram not new to this task at that point.
- speakerBut, I was surprised with the people we've met and I
- speakerthink they were surprised with us. The only difference between Allan
- speakerLocke [Locke, D. Allan] [Treasurer, Board of National Missions] and the Comptroller of this fund is that they go to different beauty parlors.
- speakerThey look upon. They look upon. Then they look upon their responsibilities
- speakerin exactly the same fashion. This, of course,
- speakerhas to do with made deadlines andwith negotiation. The thing I pointed to
- speakeris the fact that, I think, Lon [Rogers, Lon B.]
- speakerthe things that you were saying about the miners' unions [United Mine Workers] are
- speakera matter of history and a matter of questions still. With people of
- speakerwe're dealing with me in the Fund are people who have administered the
- speakerFund who, like the Board of National Missions, have the responsibility to it.
- speakerAnd, I think they're, I think they're. They are the kind of
- speakerpeople that our finance committee is. They
- speakerare the kind of people that want to get the job done. I was impressed with
- speakerMiss Roche. [Roche, Josephine A.] She was called an octogenarian. I hope
- speakerI'm as good intellectually at fifty-five as she is at eighty, believe me.
- speakerThat was two weeks ago.
- speakerBob Barrie wasn't even there. Came out of the
- speakermeeting. We divided responsibility. We said that,
- speaker"Gordon," [Corbett, Gordon Leroy] and Gordon agreed, "You've got two weeks to deliver
- speakerdeliver the governor of Kentucky."
- speakerGordon, the governor of Kentucky and a promise was delivered here yesterday.
- speakerBob [Barrie, Bob] and I decided that we had two weeks
- speakerto deliver a firm commitment to you, through
- speakerall of the governmental red tape that you can imagine is possible in Washington.
- speakerYou had that commitment here. One of the interesting things
- speakerand an interesting sidelight about this. I've heard at one point in the
- speakernegotiations, where neither Bob [Barrie] nor I were in attendance. Gordon [Corbett, Gordon Leroy]
- speakerwas invited to Washington with some of the governor's [Combs, Bert T.] staff.
- speakerThey rather looked upon him as a
- speakerpolitician, since professional people frequently do look
- speakerupon laymen as basically those laymen are preacher.
- speakerThey had a meeting. Gordon sort of got the cold shoulder.
- speakerThe next day, there was an entire change.
- speakerThe governor said to him. What's about this
- speakerUnited Presbyterian Church that it can do so many things
- speakerso fast in this town of Washington?
- speakerNow. I don't know what it is about really, respect.
- speakerExcept this. That the United Presbyterian Church has an image.
- speakerThe United Presbyterian Church has a duty.
- speakerAnd, it has. If we hopefully believe to have mobility.
- speakerNow the point of the dissertation is this.
- speakerThis is by way of saying that we are
- speakeradministrators around here in my hope. It's by way
- speakerof saying that you have the documented evidence that, under a
- speakerdifficult situation, it can be. It can be produced.
- speakerAnd, it is in that that I have my hope.
- speakerAnd I have my conviction this can be done. And let's not fool
- speakerourselves. If we don't agree with this thing, let's not
- speakerhide behind false issues of time and other things.
- speakerLet's get it on the table and talk about the issue.
- speakerI and measure them against our responsibilities in this area.
- speakerNow, there is
- speakerone other thing. I presented to you yesterday
- speakerevidences from the American Medical Association that we that they are that
- speakerwe will they will cooperate. Before we left Washington for
- speakerthe first or second time, we had talked to the American Medical
- speakerAssociation and had assurance from the people who lobby in Washington that there
- speakerwould be no problem. Is this is not right, Bob?
- speakerNo problem, with the United Presbyterian Church doing
- speakerthis.
- speakerI think I would like to report to you something that you should have already known.
- speakerAnd, that is that the chairman of the Finance Committee, who is
- speakernot able to be here, is in favor of this program.
- speakerHe's in favor of it because he believes that the United Presbyterian Church and the
- speakerBoard of National Missions needs to be mobile. It needs to be
- speakermobile. And, what we're involved in, at this point,
- speakeris a discussion, of course, of philosophy.
- speakerIt's a discussion of finance. It's a discussion of the image
- speakerof the United Presbyterian Church and, if you'll forgive me, the
- speakerProtestant Church. Now we were talking about. Ralph [Smith, Ralph T.] [Youngstown, Ohio] raised the
- speakerquestion of seventy five thousand dollars. This
- speakerlittle church where I go, has a hundred
- speakerfifty thousand dollars in Ohio in our family bank that
- speakerit does nothing under the sun with. It enables my mother to
- speakercontribute only a hundred dollars a year to that church.
- speakerNow the thing that Dick was talking about yesterday and the image that have, it is not
- speakerof National Missions alone. It is that the Protestant church and the
- speakerPresbyterian Church is a fat cat church. That is unwilling to
- speakermove out into these areas. We're not talking about the Board of National Missions
- speakerparticularly in this thing. At stake is the image
- speakerof the United, of the United Presbyterian Church. Now,
- speakerbasically we
- speakerhave to deal with the thing that we were created for.
- speakerThat is our share in the mission of the church.
- speakerThere's been a great deal of
- speakerdiscussion within executive session about
- speakerpolicies. You know that this action can be take you
- speakerunder policies that are already approved by this board.
- speakerLast year at this time, I made a statement which was.
- speakerWell, I thought, was enthusiastically received. You never can tell when people
- speakerask for things to be printed, just what that means.
- speakerBut, here's what it said.
- speakerI trust that it is conviction
- speakerand not fetish that prompts me to express
- speakeran emphatic concern vver a developing
- speakerphilosophy, which says that the church should get out of health and welfare.
- speakerThis, I believe, is philosophically untenable and
- speakertheologically unsound. I do not believe with some
- speakerthat the only function of the church in the field of health and welfare
- speakeris to provide plus service. I do
- speakerbelieve. I do not believe that it is the function of religion to
- speakersupport the institution. I do believe
- speakerthat it is the reason for the being polity institute.
- speakerI do believe that those say that the church should supply
- speakeronly plus services fall into exactly the same trap as the John
- speakerBirch Society. It implies that really now the function of a
- speakersociety, the function of religion, is to support the good society.
- speakerAnd this I submit again to you. After you had
- speakerapproved it once. That these heresies. And of the best way to
- speakerdeal with heresy is to stamp it out with action. This
- speakeraction is a part of the responsibility of the Board of National Missions
- speakeras we deal with people. One of the things that no one has
- speakertalked about until Lon Rogers got up this morning, was people.
- speakerAnd, this is why we were in business.
- speakerI've got two telegrams here. This sounds
- speakerlike Charlie Leavitt, doesn't it?
- speakerThe Presbyterians of Letcher County, Kentucky have been
- speakergratified by the genuine concern of the church for the
- speakercontinued operation of the Miners Memorial Hospitals
- speakernow threatened with closure. And our prayers are with you as
- speakeryou meet and seek to implement this concern and
- speakerbe assured of our support. Hayward, Sandlick, Graham,
- speakerIsom, Gorman and
- speakerand Blakey Presbyterian Churches in Kentucky.
- speakerI have another one, in which the entire membership is listed.
- speakerAnd it sounds like the membership and it sounds like the list of a Scottish kirk.
- speakerPeople who have been lost in the back wash of society for many years.
- speakerTo summarize, I believe that
- speakerwe need to do this. I believe
- speakerthat, Dr. Heydinger, [Heydinger, David K.] that the question of the financing
- speakerhave been answered in fact and the question
- speakerof philosophy has to be judged against ones convictions.
- speakerI believe that we can do the impossible
- speakerbecause we've always done the impossible. And
- speakerI believe that the evidence is that it can be done.
- speakerThank you, Dr. very much.
- speakerIt.
- speakerMr. Chairman, may we hear Dr. Rosenfeld [Rosenfeld, Eugene D.]?
- speaker[Barrie, Bob]No. May I say?
- speakerin answer to that, in my humble opinion,
- speakerwe have heard enough professionals.
- speakerI would like to give one more
- speakernonprofessional an opportunity to speak. Mr. Chairman. I do not want to make a statement,
- speakerI'd like to have the microphone to make a motion. All right.
- speakerI do want to make a speech, but
- speakerOK. You've got to get a second. Well, make your speech now. We need to get the mic on.
- speakerMr Chairman. The thing
- speakerthat impresses me on this, and I had a terrible time sitting very quietly all
- speakerthis period of time, is you recognize, well recognize. The thing that
- speakerimpresses me about this, is exactly what Ken [Neigh, Kenneth Glenn] has been talking about
- speakerwith this added item. That yesterday morning, most of
- speakeryou were exposed for the first time to some of the facts of life concerning the church.
- speakerAnd, almost all of you said that what we have to do is
- speakerfind the best leadership that we can find and really begin to go to work in terms of the
- speakerPresbyterian Church.
- speakerAnd I want to be I said we've got the best leadership in the Presbyterian Church. You said
- speakeryou wanted to be led. You have been.
- speakerYou have a group of men who are highly qualified, with whom I have some
- speakerpride of association from the Board standpoint, who have
- speakerworked exhausting. And, they were presented the best documented thing that has ever come to
- speakerthe Board since I've been related to it. And now, at
- speakerleast, there seems to be a question as to whether or not we are going to honor of the leadership that
- speakerwe have said we wanted.
- speakerAnd that we had to have. The Presbyterian Church had to have. And, I think it's
- speakerabout time the Board of National Missions fish or cut bait on this business of leadership.
- speakerAnd, I think it's about time we said to the General Secretary [Neigh, Kenneth Glenn] that when we elected him General Secretary, we intended him to
- speakerbe that. And, to say it so clearly that every member of the Board staff will
- speakerunderstand it. And, I think one of the ways we do it is by
- speakersupporting them when they come up with something that needs to be done on behalf of people.
- speakerSure it's impossible. But the Board of National Missions has never
- speakeryet stopped because a thing was impossible. And, Mr Chairman, I would move you, sir, that
- speakerwe approve these resolutions and that we commit them to the hands of the
- speakerproper officers of the Board.
- speakerAll right. Doctor? Speaking?
- speakerIn regard to the motion I would like simply
- speakerto raise one of the rather central questions. Ken [Neigh] raised the question, but didn't answer it, I believe,
- speakerabout the, assuming that we do,
- speakerget involved in these five hospitals. What is the
- speakerrelationship with the rest of our program in this area? This is
- speakerthe essential question, the matter of salaries, for example. I understand the
- speakersalaries the doctors in hospitals run in the neighborhood of twenty five thirty dollars dollars
- speakerThat sort of thing. Now, what happens to the rest of our salary structure throughout the
- speakerrest of our Health, Education and Welfare services?
- speakerThat is the question. I won't be able to stay to hear all the answer. I have got a wedding coming up tonight, and I'd like to hear.
- speakerDr. Barrie, I imagine, can answer it. I am sure I can't.
- speakerIt's.
- speaker[Barrie, Bob] Mr. Chairman. Ladies and gentlemen. I think one of the things in which our
- speakerpresentation yesterday was not sufficiently explicit and clear
- speakerwas made much more clear in what has already been said this
- speakermorning. And that is that the role of the Board of National Missions and the
- speakeraction which has been proposed you authorize, is very much in the
- speakernature of an intermediary. You have heard it described this morning that our role
- speakeris to make it possible for these ten hospitals, initially only a
- speakerportion of them, to be transferred from their present ownership and operation
- speakerto a new ownership and operation, under which they will become essentially community
- speakerhospitals. It is not proposed that these hospitals become,
- speakerin any sense of the word, mission hospitals in the sense that Embudo Hospital or Ganado
- speakerhospital are. So that, as I see it,
- speakerthe problem of comparing salary scales in these hospitals,
- speakerwith those at Embudo and Ganado is not a pertinent issue to the question before us
- speakerany more than it is a pertinent question to compare the salaries of
- speakerPresbyterian Hospital in Denver or New York City or San Francisco with the
- speakersalaries that Jane Cook or Jubilee or Ganado or any of our other mission stations.
- speakerMay I express that doctor.
- speakerRight. The question has been called for.
- speakerMr. Chairman. Yes. I have put my heart and my mind on this thing. Perhaps I should say my
- speakerfinancial training. I think that, however, as a member of the Finance Committee,
- speakerI ought to point out that, in my belief,
- speakerthis figure of seventy-five thousand dollars here
- speakeris not necessarily the limit of our financial
- speakerresponsibilities. We can be, we can be better be a deficit here
- speakerthat's of indeterminate
- speakerproportions. That is all I have to say.
- speakerMr. Chairman. Yes. The same way Kenny spoke. he says he is for it, and I do not
- speakerdoubt it. But, I can say that we had a small meeting of the finance committee and
- speakerthat the men there expressed their very grave concern,
- speakernot that the philosophy, but their very grave concern about
- speakerthe finances. That is the judgment
- speakerof those I think I speak and I do not speak for those that were there.
- speakerDon't misunderstand me. Not the philosophy, but the running of the thing.
- speakerAny man here, who has served on a hospital board, and there are several of us that have,
- speakerknow that there is always a deficit. I would like to think that the United Mine Workers
- speakerin the state of Kentucky would take up the deficit. I have great fears. Yes, Mrs. Salsbury. [Mrs. J. Russel Salsbury]
- speakerMr. Chairman, I would just like to
- speakerrecall to our minds of our concern in the whole area to the study that has just
- speakercome to us and been approved and that
- speakerwe're in the process of implementing. Through the division of work through the synods and the presbyteries
- speakerthe Radio and Television Department. To the millions, to the many facets of the
- speakerchurch, we are beginning to implement our concerns with that area. And,
- speakernow, this channel open, this opportunity open for us to be a channel
- speakerto greater things to happen. It seems to me that in this revolution,
- speakeron which we are voting, that we are safeguarded on. I feel perfectly satisfied
- speakerthat we are safeguarded on every angle of our
- speakeroperation. I did. I disagree with Mr.
- speakerWimberly [Wimberly, John W. ] on the fact. On the emphasis we seem to be in agreement with that our
- speakerdecision should be on whether or not we agree with the General Secretary [Neigh, Kenneth Glenn]. I feel compelled to say that
- speakerbecause I don't think he meant it that way. We are here to decide a question of deep concern
- speakerin which we are already involved and in which we are already
- speakerimplementing action. This is another open door. And, I just wanted to say that I
- speakercertainly heartily favor it.
- speakerI think the question has been
- speakerasked for. And, I have permitted another two or three people to talk already, so I
- speakerfeel that perhaps we.
- speakerMarie? I hate to do this because I think we ought to vote.
- speakerMr. Chairman, we should vote on this.
- speakerand the question.
- speaker[Marsh, Clinton [Clinton McClurkin] ] Mr Chairman. I must express this concern.
- speakerI like what has been said about the Presbyterians' interest in
- speakerpeople. And that cost, we must have money to do it.
- speakerbut I am acquainted with other
- speakerhospitals that are Presbyterian hospitals.
- speakerAnd, most of them to this date, we.
- speakerNo matter what our concern is in the presbytery, we can't do anything about
- speakerit. And, I am just concerned that, if we do this, and I think we ought to.
- speakerAnd, I am for it, that somehow a safeguard be made so that we can have
- speakersomething as Presbyterians to say what is happening where
- speakerthe people are concerned. There is no use saying you are doing this for people,
- speakerand we turn over and have a hospital in which we have little or
- speakernothing to say about how we reach people or what happens there. I will am aquainted
- speakerwith Philadelphia and Chicago and, as a presbytery
- speakerand as a Presbyterian, we can do nothing really
- speakerabout what happens for people in these particular hospitals. Now, I believe,
- speakerrecalling mention of this yesterday. And, it is my hope that this kind of a
- speakersafeguard can be written into whatever happens to us here.
- speakerSucceeding question. That
- speakerwe have
- speakerinsisted upon this safeguard all along. I think the best way to put it, and
- speakeryou'll have to put it in a theological way. Go along. We envision these hospitals
- speakerto be between the mission hospitals and the
- speakerchurch-related hospitals. Thank you, doctor. Mrs. DeLong. [DeLong, Mrs. A. Herbert] [Glens Falls, New York] Now, after Mrs.
- speakerDeLong, I must call for the vote. It was to
- speakerthis point I was thinking that. i might be wrong,
- speakerbut I took it as individuals' impressions
- speakerthat they were ready to vote. It was not put in the form of a motion. This is a serious matter.
- speakerand I would feel that we might limit
- speakerthe length of time a person might speak, but if
- speakerwe, as a group, wish the question to be called, we must put it in the form of a motion.
- speakerMove the question.
- speakerSo the question.
- speakerSecond it. All in favor will say "aye." Contrary.
- speakerAll right. We are ready to vote on the motion. Now
- speakerall in favor of the motion will say "aye." Contrary
- speakerThe motion is carried.
- speakerThe motion is carried.
- speakerI think that now we come to the time of the
- speakerreport on the Division of Education.
- speakerThe Division of Education.
- speakerIf you.