Kenneth Neigh remarks to standing committee on urbanization, 174th General Assembly, May 21, 1962, side 2.

Primary tabs

Download

  • speaker
    [Lindquist, Raymond I., speaking] It is a great thing to be a part of the extension cord. [Neigh, Kenneth Glenn, speaking] It has been my sad and solemn fate across
  • speaker
    the years to always have someone make me feel like the dog
  • speaker
    after the headliner.
  • speaker
    At the conclusion of the drafting labors of your Standing Committee on National Missions, its
  • speaker
    Secretary, an old friend of mine who is not widely known for his optimism, observed that the
  • speaker
    document was not monumental. This is true. It is not a great utterance
  • speaker
    about the state of the Church or its nature. It is however, a thoughtful review
  • speaker
    of the program, referrals to, and projections of, the Board of National Missions made in all too short a time. To this most adequate
  • speaker
    document, may I add a footnote. May I add a statement of intention. Being more
  • speaker
    conservative of speech, may I apologize for some lack of oratorical orthodoxy in refraining from quoting D. T. Niles [Daniel Thambyrajah Niles] or Lesslie
  • speaker
    Newbigin and return to the oldhat, but old stand by,
  • speaker
    Arnold Toynbee. Dr Toynbee wrote recently, in effect,
  • speaker
    that America was somewhat like a man with two wives to support,
  • speaker
    but who had an all but forgotten child by a former marriage.
  • speaker
    The two wives, he continued, are Africa and Asia.
  • speaker
    And they were coming in for a fulsome, albeit sentimental
  • speaker
    attention, but the child, America's adolescent culture, was left to fend for itself.
  • speaker
    It is in the care for the abandoned child of the first wife that the
  • speaker
    church still has a concern and National Missions has some
  • speaker
    intentions. Last year, from this Assembly's platform in
  • speaker
    Buffalo, speaking to this same report, a young
  • speaker
    United Presbyterian layman, a professor of political science at New York
  • speaker
    University, told the one hundred seventy third General Assembly,
  • speaker
    as only a layman could, what he thought of a church that runs away from the
  • speaker
    city. Reporters call his speech the best of the Assembly.
  • speaker
    It was searing, frightening, intense, humorous and
  • speaker
    convicting. It was intended to make the church man enough to fight
  • speaker
    for its life. In a nation becoming more urbanised
  • speaker
    with every tick of the clock. The trouble was that he did not know
  • speaker
    that the fight that he had intended to start in his own church as
  • speaker
    a principle was largely over. Stems from a
  • speaker
    conviction, based upon what I think is documentable experience,
  • speaker
    that the United Presbyterian Church in the United States of America put
  • speaker
    the brakes upon its flight from the city more than a decade ago.
  • speaker
    It is also based upon the conviction that when the General Assembly
  • speaker
    directed its churches to minister to the neighborhoods in which they were located,
  • speaker
    it set the denomination on the move in urban America.
  • speaker
    For in so doing, it added sinews and support
  • speaker
    to its servants deep in the conflict. And, it is no new news to the
  • speaker
    Board of National Missions, its staff, the staff of any
  • speaker
    urban synod or presbytery, or the committees thereof,
  • speaker
    that when trained personnel, programs that speak to the community,
  • speaker
    and decent financial resources are available, your church can and
  • speaker
    does slug it out successfully with the debilitating, demoralizing
  • speaker
    forces of paganism. For example on Sunday
  • speaker
    afternoon, when most of us were engaged in the annual rites of
  • speaker
    self-congratulation which are the Sunday afternoon Board teas,
  • speaker
    a significant, but unusual occasion was being
  • speaker
    observed in Cleveland Ohio. The Glenville United Presbyterian
  • speaker
    Church was being formally organized by the Presbytery of Cleveland.
  • speaker
    This culmination of less than a year's work, elicited the following comment
  • speaker
    from the head of the regional church planning office.
  • speaker
    "The United Presbyterian Church is one of only two denominations,
  • speaker
    which have had the courage and the vigor to keep the ministry of the Christian Church
  • speaker
    alive in the Glenville area since the community became racially integrated."
  • speaker
    Now the fact that such comments are fairly commonplace in this day,
  • speaker
    and the fact that the list of points where urban culture
  • speaker
    is being successfully confronted fairly long, this
  • speaker
    is not a time to say that the church is leaping to the task.
  • speaker
    Our witness suffers desperately from fiscal and personal anemia, which must be
  • speaker
    corrected. Our witness, however, is also suffering. Suffering from
  • speaker
    an addiction to negative cliches, which we mouth long after
  • speaker
    to the truth has been sucked out. One is this. The church
  • speaker
    runs from the city. Another, which is about ten years out of date, too,
  • speaker
    is accusingly, "The church is the captive of the suburb. Now
  • speaker
    this seems to say that new churches are ministering to fugitives from the city.
  • speaker
    And, that those who enter there, come only by letters of dismissal.
  • speaker
    The truth is that a healthy seventy two percent of the members over the last ten years
  • speaker
    came on profession or reaffirmation of their faith in Jesus Christ.
  • speaker
    And, it is sheer sophistry to suggest that these emerging,
  • speaker
    burgeoning, restless populations, who move from city to city,
  • speaker
    city to suburb, suburb to suburg, and from suburb back to the city, that they stand
  • speaker
    any less in need of the gospel simply because they do not make their move
  • speaker
    in prairie schooners. And if, as D. T. Niles suggests,
  • speaker
    the nut of the future does lie in Western Europe and America,
  • speaker
    then they probably need the Gospel even more.
  • speaker
    Now, you will know from the document in your hands,
  • speaker
    it does not confine itself to a report, on these two important aspects
  • speaker
    of National Missions. As you read, you catch the short breath of urgency
  • speaker
    in town. in town and country. Health, welfare, and education.
  • speaker
    You have already caught it from the commissions on radio and television and evangelism.
  • speaker
    But, I lift up new church development and the urban church out of the text.
  • speaker
    Because it is about them that one may best center the intention
  • speaker
    of National Missions. And what is that intention? It is to
  • speaker
    carry out the will of God for this our day, as directed by this
  • speaker
    General Assembly. This we will do, in the face of thread
  • speaker
    bare structues, historic prejudices, financial strictures,
  • speaker
    Councilar pressures to often belabored in any Assembly.
  • speaker
    This National Missions will do by continuing to update its administration
  • speaker
    upon the principle that administration is best exercised
  • speaker
    where the service is rendered. And, that is where you live.
  • speaker
    This National Missions will do by establishing budgeting procedures
  • speaker
    within National Missions that will provide mobility and assure the
  • speaker
    church that its National Missions resources are directed at the proper
  • speaker
    point at the proper time. This it will do it by providing
  • speaker
    planning procedures and planners, that in the areas assigned to
  • speaker
    National Missions, the church may precede and never again follow
  • speaker
    social and cultural movements. This National Missions will do by
  • speaker
    providing within it, evaluating processes by which the far-flung
  • speaker
    programs of National Missions will be held up and judged in the light of each other
  • speaker
    and in the company of the peers. This it will do in
  • speaker
    cocnert with the other boards and agencies, as well as within the
  • speaker
    ecumenical circles of cooperation described in this report. For example,
  • speaker
    urbanization is the result of industrialization. And, this
  • speaker
    problem is not national, it is a worldwide problem.
  • speaker
    This National Missions will do by a realistic appraisal of its needs.
  • speaker
    And an even more realistic appraisal of its own ability to
  • speaker
    meet its needs. Much of this it will do through its national
  • speaker
    staff, which is as fine a cadre of leadership as is found in
  • speaker
    Protestantism. As a practicing pastor,
  • speaker
    as an administrator in theological education and synod and presbytery,
  • speaker
    I have, like you, levelled many charges against the national church and its
  • speaker
    agencies. As a Board secretary, I have heard even more.
  • speaker
    But the most serious, I have not heard. I think it's this.
  • speaker
    Never have the church and the judicatories and the agencies so
  • speaker
    conspired to put carpet slippers on the soul of the church, for never have we
  • speaker
    been so concerned with eliminating our problems at a discount.
  • speaker
    This is by way of saying that the tin cup and pencil approach to the needs of
  • speaker
    Toynbee's disinherited child are unworthy of the church. The total
  • speaker
    resources of the church must be mobilized, including its credit, wherever
  • speaker
    that credit is found. To this end the Board of National Missions has
  • speaker
    made a ten year projection of capital required, capital requirements.
  • speaker
    This amoung achieves the astronomical total of some eighty-five million
  • speaker
    dollars. It includes urban new church development, mission
  • speaker
    church and institutional needs. Obvious amount it appears that the
  • speaker
    Board over ten years can anticipate twenty-eight million three
  • speaker
    hundred fifty thousand dollars from board resources or funds now.
  • speaker
    assigned to it. Of the remaining amount, ten million dollars
  • speaker
    could be obtained by additional borrowing from the New York.
  • speaker
    Life insurance company. The General Assembly of nineteen fifty-eight
  • speaker
    approved a ten million dollar loan from New York Life for the purposes of new church
  • speaker
    development. This is borrowed fund is about exhausted.
  • speaker
    And, if the United Presbyterian Church in the USA is to continue to
  • speaker
    meet its full share of the Protestant responsibility for our spirialling
  • speaker
    populations, we must provide. Therefore, the Board of National
  • speaker
    Missions, in concurrence with the General Council, requests you to
  • speaker
    permit the borrowing of ten million dollars additional from the New York Life,
  • speaker
    in a method to be described by the General Council, and in the
  • speaker
    addenda to your report. Provision is being made for
  • speaker
    other Board needs by redefinition of existing rules
  • speaker
    and by new plans of financing, not to be
  • speaker
    confused or in conflict with, the proposed capital funds campaign. This all is
  • speaker
    a great deal of money, especially for someone
  • speaker
    from a small town from the high hills of Ohio. And, I agree with the classic statement of William Inge in his play, "The Dark
  • speaker
    at the Top of the Stairs," as apropos for the church and National Missions.
  • speaker
    Darned, if I don't think it's sometimes easier, sometimes easier, to pioneer a
  • speaker
    country than to settle down in it. Mr. Moderator.
  • speaker
    What you have just heard was Mr. Neigh [Neigh, Kenneth Glenn] speak at the General Assembly in nineteen sixty-two.

Bookmark

BookBags: