Dean Lewis interviewed by R. W. Bauer, 1983, side 1.

Primary tabs

Download

  • speaker
    And therefore from the
  • speaker
    first built it around a very special
  • speaker
    kind of clear analysis of GA policy which we got through
  • speaker
    in sixty
  • speaker
    eight
  • speaker
    and moving into
  • speaker
    the institutional location
  • speaker
    where emergency needs funding was supposed to be built. That was the first
  • speaker
    time we ever
  • speaker
    tapped One Great Hour of
  • speaker
    Sharing for anything other than typhoons or orphans
  • speaker
    or stuff like that. They'd always had this
  • speaker
    little gimic in there about
  • speaker
    victims of political or economic or something like that. But, it had never been used for
  • speaker
    anything except to fund some ministries to service personnel
  • speaker
    overseas. And, for a long number of years since the second World War,
  • speaker
    civilian visitors on military
  • speaker
    bases here in this country. I don't know about
  • speaker
    both those programs, but they had been using One Great Hour of Sharing
  • speaker
    money for some time under that rubric. And,
  • speaker
    that's where I decided to look or fight for response
  • speaker
    to
  • speaker
    this quote "emergency," which was confroning the nation and the
  • speaker
    church. And, of course, the way to do it was
  • speaker
    the conscientious objector route,
  • speaker
    the emergency minister route.
  • speaker
    and got the full Institutional legitimation out of that
  • speaker
    source. So it did
  • speaker
    become for all practical purposes the
  • speaker
    only the only plight that the Presbyterian Church had for responding to the issues of
  • speaker
    the Vietnam War period. We never had
  • speaker
    other than the modest capacities that the Church and Society Department had.
  • speaker
    We never had any money for anything. We never had
  • speaker
    in the church anything in response to that, other than the policy
  • speaker
    statement kind of thing. so that it did become a
  • speaker
    rallying point for a lot of
  • speaker
    activity of cinema and
  • speaker
    people A network of people who were concerned about that
  • speaker
    function. [Bauer] Who were the key actors in getting this thing
  • speaker
    put together? I don't mean the policy, but
  • speaker
    as much as. [Lewis] Well, I designed the
  • speaker
    structure of it. In fact, I know where the file is, and I did
  • speaker
    run across the original memo i wrote to more or less about taking
  • speaker
    something to the General Council, designing the
  • speaker
    structure, approaching the first budget, and stuff like that. That would
  • speaker
    be needed. [Bauer]Was that before or after the policy? Well it
  • speaker
    was interesting because what happened was
  • speaker
    that in the sixty-eight policy statement that went to the Assembly.
  • speaker
    There was
  • speaker
    a there was a request for this sort of thing.
  • speaker
    And the assembly asked that it be tabled for a year and a further
  • speaker
    study. And, that further study was done. It was during that
  • speaker
    year appealing to this process that was going on, because Carey Joint
  • speaker
    committee was working at the same time. [Bauer] Who? [Lewis] Carey Joint. the General Assembly had also
  • speaker
    up a special committee to
  • speaker
    study to the church's response to Vietnam, and they produced a book
  • speaker
    so that it actually came
  • speaker
    along with the policy and
  • speaker
    the validation was essentially on the basis
  • speaker
    of the pastoral deed
  • speaker
    which was emerging in the church which was also validated
  • speaker
    by an earlier statement of the Assembly about sixty
  • speaker
    six about ministering to the victims of the. I would have to look that up.
  • speaker
    So that it really came along that they, the General Assembly
  • speaker
    never. The General Assembly did
  • speaker
    not call in specific terms
  • speaker
    for this emergency ministry. That was a programmatic response that was framed on the basis of
  • speaker
    a general policy. And they reported, reported to
  • speaker
    But the big the big battle, of course, was
  • speaker
    in committee
  • speaker
    that dealt with globaal emergency service funding. The General Council's
  • speaker
    committee. work committee.
  • speaker
    the terms of. John Thompson
  • speaker
    Peters [Pastor, Toledo, OH, Collingwood Avenue Presbyterian Church] was on that.
  • speaker
    Al Roberts [Roberts, Alcwyn Lloyd] was
  • speaker
    staffing it at that time. I can't remember
  • speaker
    this, but John Peters was
  • speaker
    and it was, it was a sizable
  • speaker
    struggle [Bauer] Was the struggle ostensibly about
  • speaker
    the use of the funds but really about something else?
  • speaker
    Or is it the usual pattern that we deal with substance by dealing with?
  • speaker
    [Lewis] It was both. There
  • speaker
    was
  • speaker
    But I think I really think that the main
  • speaker
    concern both stated and implicit
  • speaker
    was the potentially controversial character
  • speaker
    of the program and its potential effect on One Great Hour of Sharing
  • speaker
    giving,
  • speaker
    which was an
  • speaker
    institutional defense against
  • speaker
    doing what seemed to be a useful thing to do. There
  • speaker
    was there was also a
  • speaker
    lot of argument against the folk,
  • speaker
    who really had thought of the One Great Hour of Sharing all the time
  • speaker
    as overseas relief operations.
  • speaker
    That line still runs very strong. [Bauer] Right. [Lewis] Bill Du Val [Du Val, William K.] still
  • speaker
    is very
  • speaker
    very jealous of those funds, in terms of anything that goes on in the U.S.
  • speaker
    By God, you got to have a typhoon that knocks the hell out of
  • speaker
    sixteen states before he begins
  • speaker
    to see the possibility of doing anything. And that, of course, comes out
  • speaker
    of images of
  • speaker
    the U.S. as being a great big place that can take care of its own. So that was part of it
  • speaker
    too and that was part of Du Val's struggle. Cause Du Val was
  • speaker
    In those days, you see, the One Great Hour of
  • speaker
    Sharing business had no
  • speaker
    staff. The committee that ran it
  • speaker
    was simply, that ran the allocations
  • speaker
    process, was simply a committee
  • speaker
    that allocated funds
  • speaker
    to programs in the agencies and there was
  • speaker
    no there was no
  • speaker
    staff cost paid
  • speaker
    anywhere out of One Great Hour of Sharing funds. [Bauer] But Al Roberts
  • speaker
    was the Associate on the General Council [Associate Secretary, General Council] or something?
  • speaker
    [Lewis] But not for that purpose. he had that aberration
  • speaker
    here right and Du Val [Du Val, William K.] was functioning
  • speaker
    for COEMAR [Commission on Ecumenical Mission and Relations] in terms of
  • speaker
    some kind of assignment, but none of those
  • speaker
    things were paid for out of One Great Hour of Sharing funds.
  • speaker
    COEMAR paid Du Val's salary to do what he
  • speaker
    did. General Council paid Al Roberts salary in
  • speaker
    the last of this
  • speaker
    process so that also part of the
  • speaker
    struggle was
  • speaker
    over the use of One Great Hous of Sharing funds to fund
  • speaker
    staff. And, of course, it was essential to establish to establish the concept that the staff
  • speaker
    is the program. That is what you are talking about.
  • speaker
    So that was the argument that was used
  • speaker
    against it. Now it has now become
  • speaker
    commonplace, of course, And whether this precedent had anything to do with it, I don't know.
  • speaker
    I think so. Of course, it has now become a commonplace for the agencies to
  • speaker
    charge off staff
  • speaker
    costs against the programs
  • speaker
    sharing some of
  • speaker
    development. Resettlement. All those are now charged against the offering itself.
  • speaker
    Part of that came in one of the first of the first cutbacks before the
  • speaker
    reorganization. One of the people
  • speaker
    targeted for, to be fired in COEMAR was
  • speaker
    Du Val. And Du Val would have, would have been
  • speaker
    let go if Huff, Gene Huff [Huff, E. Eugene]
  • speaker
    had not gone in to the General
  • speaker
    Council. And Du Val was not willing to do it. General
  • speaker
    Council and pushed the line that Du Val
  • speaker
    knowledge and
  • speaker
    work around questions of development, relief, and so forth was so critical to
  • speaker
    the operation of this church that his
  • speaker
    salary needed to be picked up by the Fund itself
  • speaker
    or a major part of it. [Bauer] This is around nineteen
  • speaker
    seventy, perhaps? [Lewis] Sixty-nine, seventy.there somewhere. Because it was before
  • speaker
    the reorganization. In a pre-reorganization cutback.
  • speaker
    [Bauer] It's interesting as you talked about
  • speaker
    this, you initially talked about
  • speaker
    about it in terms of, in contrast to the National Mission style.
  • speaker
    This was rather clean, open, above-board, straight shooter institution.
  • speaker
    [Lewis] There's papers al the way. Right, with a lid on. And, you just went after a pile of
  • speaker
    money that was
  • speaker
    there and already had in it. that the majority vote finally. [Bauer] Right. But the
  • speaker
    the rationale in the funding agencies mandate
  • speaker
    to some of the good. It just had to be the end they had to be convinced that they meant.
  • speaker
    this. [Bauer] All that seems to walk right past the question of
  • speaker
    the controversy over the Vietnam War and over conscientious, conscientious objection
  • speaker
    the
  • speaker
    That was not a big factor or do you think the church
  • speaker
    was convinced of
  • speaker
    that? [Lewis] Oh! No! The church was particularly
  • speaker
    but the fact that by that
  • speaker
    time even, there were already a sufficient
  • speaker
    number of ruling elders' sons were [Bauer] In Canada or some place else.
  • speaker
    what other did hurt I mean it
  • speaker
    was possible to say this in
  • speaker
    the Presbyterian young people and we of course pitched
  • speaker
    it very strongly of the church's traditional
  • speaker
    support for the right of conscience and the need. in the end
  • speaker
    we had they were very
  • speaker
    strict very very
  • speaker
    strict rules that they tried to put on this. and in
  • speaker
    fact some of the
  • speaker
    statements were very sharp, you know. We must
  • speaker
    not use this program of counsel in any way
  • speaker
    that would try to persuade people about what choice they
  • speaker
    should make. It was only to to guide their
  • speaker
    conscience the way it's. When their
  • speaker
    conscience which is somehow autonomously formed, you know. that's not
  • speaker
    Then it is the responsibility of the church, you know, to support them in
  • speaker
    this and so
  • speaker
    forth with that. And, that's when I first became interested
  • speaker
    because it was so damn
  • speaker
    curious doctrine that it was not any part of the responsibility of the church
  • speaker
    to form conscience. Who the hell did people think
  • speaker
    conscience came from?
  • speaker
    And, the Christian Education. that's the first time I became aware
  • speaker
    really of why I was resisting so
  • speaker
    vehemently the approach that the damn Christian education professionals were
  • speaker
    trying to write in the church's curriculum, the new church curriculum. What was it called? N.C.E.S. or
  • speaker
    Yes [Bauer] C.F.A. Christian Faith in Action. [Lewis] C.F.A. Yeah.
  • speaker
    Perseids
  • speaker
    because that basis
  • speaker
    basis of not trying to persuade people
  • speaker
    to anything but simply giving them the tools with which they could make their own judgments
  • speaker
    about things and teaching
  • speaker
    them critical reasoning and giving them the resources that
  • speaker
    were available, and that kind of shit. I did there's something
  • speaker
    wrong. And, that's where it became clear to me
  • speaker
    people are at se without
  • speaker
    some
  • speaker
    institutions in society that are at least trying to shape values
  • speaker
    and quite openly and quite deliberately say, "Here's the way we think you want to be thinking
  • speaker
    about these things. We can't force you to, or stake you if
  • speaker
    you don't or anything,
  • speaker
    but you know this institution
  • speaker
    whose function in society is supposed to be as a
  • speaker
    definer and
  • speaker
    verifier of values, says this and you should know
  • speaker
    that. [Bauer] But yet you kept some distance between this
  • speaker
    and the anti-war movement in terms of
  • speaker
    public. [Lewis] We had to. There was no
  • speaker
    way that these
  • speaker
    funding agencies and folk like that were going to sit there and fund an
  • speaker
    operation that said up front we're going to out and try to convince
  • speaker
    Presbyterian young people that they should not
  • speaker
    fight in the Vietnam War. And, there was just no way they were going to do that.
  • speaker
    So we had to go at it peripherally, which we did. Then in the Council on Church
  • speaker
    and Society in the later statement
  • speaker
    on the church consicence and war. ["War, Peace, and Conscience: Statement of the 181st General Assembly, 1969"] Which lays
  • speaker
    out the basis
  • speaker
    of the church's opposition to war and selective conscientious objection. But
  • speaker
    the program all the way
  • speaker
    through was defined as a
  • speaker
    ministry to conscientious objectors, US, Canada, Sweden, everywhere.
  • speaker
    although, obviously, it spilled over into other kinds of
  • speaker
    It did, as I say,
  • speaker
    function
  • speaker
    It was a kind of rallying point. Because. It was
  • speaker
    interesting. Another one of my problems during that era was trying to get the
  • speaker
    Presbyterian Peace Fellowship.
  • speaker
    interested in being non-war
  • speaker
    in any kind of useful way for the
  • speaker
    church, cause they didn't function
  • speaker
    and still don't too much. It is very interesting. [Bauer] They are for peace, but?
  • speaker
    [Lewis] Well, the Presbyterian Peace Fellowship was an outgrowth of the FOR.
  • speaker
    Of course, it was organized in the thirties as a pacifist
  • speaker
    organization. And the. Their
  • speaker
    whole business was
  • speaker
    really to promote pacifism. A total
  • speaker
    opposition to the war. At its root, it is really a
  • speaker
    haven for pacifists. and the issues of the Vietnam
  • speaker
    War, that kind selective
  • speaker
    pacifism that was involved or just simply war
  • speaker
    resistance
  • speaker
    was not the thing with them.
  • speaker
    The organization was
  • speaker
    dominated by a group of older pacifists. John
  • speaker
    [Bauer] The old liberal establishment of pacifists. [Lewis]
  • speaker
    Right. The pacifist part
  • speaker
    of
  • speaker
    it and they just weren't
  • speaker
    functioning very much at all. Adn they said to the church and the New York Times
  • speaker
    in
  • speaker
    either out of that movement
  • speaker
    the ways in which the Church and Society folk could mediate
  • speaker
    church
  • speaker
    and laity concern operation
  • speaker
    [Bauer] Who carry the
  • speaker
    freight on this? I mean, you keep saying "we."
  • speaker
    Are you talking about the Council?
  • speaker
    staff crew? [Lewis] I did most of it. It was
  • speaker
    It was not a ministry of the Council of Church and Society. It was a ministry of the Board of Christian
  • speaker
    Education. It was not run out of the Council.
  • speaker
    I defined it. Of course, the Council
  • speaker
    Of course, the Council at that point. [Bauer] At what point
  • speaker
    did the Council become? [Lewis] It became the Council on Church and Society in sixty-eight.
  • speaker
    It had been a
  • speaker
    counseling committee of the Board of Christian
  • speaker
    Education up to that time. But it was a Board of Christian
  • speaker
    Education
  • speaker
    ministry essentially. [Bauer] not the Council of
  • speaker
    Church and Society operation.
  • speaker
    [Lewis] The Board
  • speaker
    until the reorganization
  • speaker
    split the relationship between the Council of
  • speaker
    Church and Society. And, the staff of the department was very
  • speaker
    ambiguous. It was the Board of Christian Education's department
  • speaker
    on Church and
  • speaker
    Society, not the council's. The
  • speaker
    council had something to say about the sort of
  • speaker
    stuff that went on. Contrary to the opinion of the people who
  • speaker
    re-organized the church of the council of Church and Society had never
  • speaker
    been a programmatic body.
  • speaker
    Never determined progam priorities. Never had passed on program. It had never adopted budgets or anything.
  • speaker
    It always kept in arrear as a kind of
  • speaker
    advisory on flaming G.A. pronouncements.
  • speaker
    program budget stuff decisions
  • speaker
    were made at the Board of Christian Education regular process.
  • speaker
    but it was. I did most of it. And, of course, when Milton came on.
  • speaker
    he was responsible. We named
  • speaker
    an advisory
  • speaker
    committee to run it after the very
  • speaker
    first. Committee of what? I guess maybe ten people.
  • speaker
    Sensitive
  • speaker
    challenge. was one of those people.
  • speaker
    I don't remember now who they were, but there was an advisory
  • speaker
    committee that ran it theoretically. It met from time to time to set
  • speaker
    policy and direction, mission and program.
  • speaker
    And then we got Yolten [Yolten, L. William] staff. Yolten had been in Australia.
  • speaker
    He had been a university pastor from Australia, visiting thing, and he came back and took this over. You know Bill first move
  • speaker
    formidable energy. But unswerving
  • speaker
    concentration on general a fairly narrow range
  • speaker
    of
  • speaker
    points, which he pursues with
  • speaker
    great vigor and energy. I think for
  • speaker
    most of the years he ran
  • speaker
    that with a good job of doing what needed to be done.
  • speaker
    Toward the end, it got
  • speaker
    more and more
  • speaker
    shrill, I think, as his own. [Bauer] As the
  • speaker
    anti war pitch grew. [Lewis] Yes. [Bauer] Well, when did Johnson resign?
  • speaker
    [Lewis] Well, he. You mean Nixon? Johnson didn't
  • speaker
    resign, he just didn't run again. [Bauer] Ah, year. That is what I mean.
  • speaker
    [Lewis] It was sixty-six, sixty seven. [Bauer] He said he wasn't going to run.
  • speaker
    sixty six [Lewis] See, Nixon was elected in sixty
  • speaker
    eight and in seventy-two again [Bauer] So that the
  • speaker
    fever pitch of the antiwar movement was pretty high when
  • speaker
    this first
  • speaker
    policy statement came to the G.A.
  • speaker
    [Lewis] Well it was. The antiwar movement went in
  • speaker
    cycles, as you know. When Johnson
  • speaker
    stepped down and decided not to run again,
  • speaker
    and conversations had
  • speaker
    kind of tailed off. Then when Nixon came in and
  • speaker
    revived, they went up again.
  • speaker
    There had been a
  • speaker
    clear statement about the war. It wasn't all that clear.
  • speaker
    The so-called Declaration of nineteen sixty-seven
  • speaker
    at Portland
  • speaker
    that Robert McAfee
  • speaker
    Brown did. declaration
  • speaker
    of conscience it
  • speaker
    was called. up until that
  • speaker
    point under
  • speaker
    Clifford's [Earle, Clifford John] kind of United Nations balance of
  • speaker
    power sort of
  • speaker
    leadership and the General Assembly's
  • speaker
    ambivalence, I think,
  • speaker
    as well as Clifford's not very crisp leadership
  • speaker
    Well, the Vietnam War was a
  • speaker
    big problem. And some people feel one way and some people feel another,
  • speaker
    The church should study this, which was kind of what was said in sixty-
  • speaker
    six. But you have got to remember that
  • speaker
    the big escalation of that war didn't come until late
  • speaker
    sixty-five sixty maybe early sixty-
  • speaker
    five, but it really didn't start building
  • speaker
    up in the concern of some people. I remember
  • speaker
    interviewing a guy for a job
  • speaker
    It must have been about
  • speaker
    sixty, late
  • speaker
    sixty-four, or sixty-five, something like that, who had
  • speaker
    a big concern
  • speaker
    about the Vietnam War. Remember at that time, it was really not all that much.
  • speaker
    all these elements and stuff like that.
  • speaker
    Tried to argue all kinds of balance of power stuff.
  • speaker
    So sixty seven declaration of conscience was the first statement. In sixty
  • speaker
    eight I was asked to take over the Church and Society
  • speaker
    Office the first of January sixty-eight.
  • speaker
    I had been in South America.
  • speaker
    Most of the first half of sixty
  • speaker
    seven, February to August, really.
  • speaker
    I had been in South America on a sabbatical. It was during that
  • speaker
    period that the Board of National missions took over the
  • speaker
    Church and Race operation. I remember talking to
  • speaker
    Jim Gailey [Gailey, James R.] and Bill Morrison [Morrison, William A.], Bryant George
  • speaker
    from Argentina, and then from Uruguay, as these guys were
  • speaker
    calling in about. Bill calling
  • speaker
    in, because that was what they were deciding to take
  • speaker
    commission status away
  • speaker
    from CORAR [Commission on Religion and Race] and increase
  • speaker
    its effectiveness by incorporating it into the Board of National
  • speaker
    Missions so that it would have a vital connection to
  • speaker
    [Bauer] Yes. [Lewis] Yeah.
  • speaker
    You ought to read sometime, by the way the account of Charles
  • speaker
    Stelsley's work in the church, back in nineteen. [Bauer] Yeah,
  • speaker
    a little bit. [Lewis] It is
  • speaker
    the same kind of stuff. They finally
  • speaker
    reorganized. [Bauer] That's right.
  • speaker
    [Lewis] So that
  • speaker
    when I got back the first of
  • speaker
    September that had all
  • speaker
    been done pretty much.
  • speaker
    and the Church and Society Department was sort of flailing
  • speaker
    around trying to figure out what they would do for the sixty
  • speaker
    eight General
  • speaker
    Assembly and.
  • speaker
    And I think already pretty well decided they would try to
  • speaker
    focus their efforts more. But, they left about October
  • speaker
    I guess. About the
  • speaker
    the first of January, and we decided to go to the
  • speaker
    Assembly with the Church and Society operation or even working with it,
  • speaker
    with two major foci: the crisis in the cities, the
  • speaker
    crisis in the nation and the Vietnam War. And, that was the
  • speaker
    first major statement
  • speaker
    about the Vietnam War, that sixty-eight one. And
  • speaker
    as you say, the church and laity concern was already in
  • speaker
    the streets. The Vietnam War movement was
  • speaker
    already vigorous. Sixty-eight was the year we
  • speaker
    started emergency ministry also.
  • speaker
    that
  • speaker
    And got that moving.
  • speaker
    bit because if you remember the sixty nine
  • speaker
    Assembly was James Forman and the
  • speaker
    whole Black Manifesto
  • speaker
    in the San Antonio. The Church and
  • speaker
    Society report that year
  • speaker
    was, figured mainly around Latin
  • speaker
    America issues documents, illusion of reality, stuff
  • speaker
    like that. Nixon had just
  • speaker
    taken
  • speaker
    over remember in January sixty-nine. Johnson
  • speaker
    had announced that he was not going
  • speaker
    to be a candidate in the late spring sixty
  • speaker
    eight because he wanted to help unify and settle this war.
  • speaker
    So people were sitting there
  • speaker
    waiting. By seventy again,
  • speaker
    remember, that was the Chicago
  • speaker
    Assembly. You had the submarine
  • speaker
    church, all that crap, but you also
  • speaker
    have a big debate on
  • speaker
    the Vietnam. The invitation to Nixon to come address the
  • speaker
    Assembly. He sent Romney instead. George Romney came and addressed
  • speaker
    the assembly. So it was heating up
  • speaker
    again in sixty-nine.
  • speaker
    [Bauer] nineteen seventy. [Lewis] Seventy.
  • speaker
    And, it kept on putzing around until
  • speaker
    seventy-two, seventy-three. The
  • speaker
    program lasted how long? five
  • speaker
    years "Emergency Ministry."
  • speaker
    least I think so it was five
  • speaker
    years and we just went on to the next one, which
  • speaker
    was enough veterans. [Bauer] Vietnam veterans was
  • speaker
    over by seventy-five.
  • speaker
    How long did that last? That's about right. [Lewis]
  • speaker
    They overlapped. They overlapped. [Bauer] They overlapped somewhat.
  • speaker
    [Lewis] They overlapped. That's
  • speaker
    right yes I think it was over by seventy-five.
  • speaker
    [Bauer] That's what i wanted to. I think so.
  • speaker
    I went to see
  • speaker
    C.T.S. there was just a vestige of
  • speaker
    the thing around at that point. Maybe it went on a little
  • speaker
    bit longer.
  • speaker
    [Lewis] It seems to me it
  • speaker
    was seventy-seven. [Bauer] Could be.
  • speaker
    [Lewis] Even the people in Louisville. We moved the operation to Louisville.
  • speaker
    [Bauer] That's right that's right. [Lewis] There was not that much awareness of it
  • speaker
    and took it more into community organization.
  • speaker
    [Bauer] Pete [Lewis] Salerno [Salerno, Peter D., Jr.] [Bauer] Salerno. [Lewis] He took the board to community
  • speaker
    organization and to work with vets in
  • speaker
    prison. He is the one who started
  • speaker
    the incarcerated vets business when he discovered that there
  • speaker
    was a vastly disproportionate number of Vietnam vets in prisons.
  • speaker
    But, I think it went on to seventy
  • speaker
    seven. Maybe late seventy-seven. It was five years.
  • speaker
    It started in seventy-two. [Bauer] Where did the money for that come from?
  • speaker
    [Lewis] Same place. [Bauer] Same place.
  • speaker
    [Lewis] And in each instance
  • speaker
    I must admit that the
  • speaker
    terminal facility that was built into it was not
  • speaker
    altogether a matter of altruism,
  • speaker
    institutional responsibility. I mean Du Val [Du Val, William K.] in particular
  • speaker
    and some of the other people on
  • speaker
    the World Relief Committee were
  • speaker
    just adamant about getting those funds out of there. They were
  • speaker
    attacking them all toward the end of each period. As they could
  • speaker
    because they began to see
  • speaker
    there was a drain on these funds. And, my
  • speaker
    arguments that they had been
  • speaker
    funding servicemen's centers overseas
  • speaker
    for twenty-five years, seemed the thing to
  • speaker
    So both of those were
  • speaker
    terminated, which is an important point,
  • speaker
    although the reasons for this termination are altogether
  • speaker
    really one of the things it does concern me about
  • speaker
    some of these other operations. And, I think one has to be a prominent
  • speaker
    concern is when you hook the church institutionally into
  • speaker
    some crisis response,
  • speaker
    how in the hell do you keep it from becoming institutionalized, bureaucratized
  • speaker
    and built in as a kind of continuing
  • speaker
    commitment of the church?
  • speaker
    I am doing stuff like this, I know, but I'll tell you, I'm.

Bookmark

BookBags: