You are here
Dean Lewis interviewed by R. W. Bauer, 1983, side 2.
Primary tabs
Download
- speaker[Lewis] Actually
- speakerbeing deployed by strategies
- speakerthat
- speakerthis
- speakerwhole refugee resettlement and emergency
- speakerservices, the Hunger Program, you know,
- speakerthe Self Development program.
- speakerYou can, you can argue that those
- speakerrepresent continuing commitments of the church, and sure
- speakerenough, they do. But, also social prison
- speakerhistory, work with alcoholics. You know you
- speakercan any number of things. You can
- speakerinterface work with the community organizations,
- speakermetropolitan development and
- speakerthe combination
- speakerof of a relatively
- speakerprotected source of institutional
- speakerfunding, with
- speakera program with bureaucratic interest build up
- speakerwas has in essence isolated
- speakera sum of money equal to
- speakerto what
- speaker[Bauer] A third of the
- speakerprograms? [Lewis] Oh, more than that. programs. A third at
- speakerleast of the Program Agency's total resources
- speakeravailable, only about twelve and a half million for General Mission. They give us seven and a half million
- speakerThey have so many other things to do with it. That really
- speakerisn't capable of being examined in the
- speakerrational priority part of the system and can't
- speakerbe
- speakereffectively re-ordered to meet situations that the church
- speakermight want to define as more
- speakerSo you got a situation there where
- speakeryou either have to find a way. This is what I analyzed back in sixty eight
- speakeralready but you either had to find a way to get into one of those systems where money was already
- speakeravailable
- speakersomehow or operate it on a shoestring.
- speakerBecause I had not yet tumbled to the fact then that it
- speakerwas possible to expand
- speakerthat kitty. I tumbled to that in seventy-five
- speakerwhen it came time to do hunger funding
- speakerOne Great Hour of Sharing. and Du Val [Du Val, William K.] screamed
- speakerYou're going to ruin the program and of
- speakercourse as I crossed my fingers and believed it
- speakerwould result in expansion because it
- speakeralready looked
- speakerin the Self-Devlopment of People thing. [Bauer] Yes. [Lewis] that was the
- speakerthird interest but it just trippled the fund instead of doubling that because that
- speakerwas. i don't think you could do that again. [Bauer] No.
- speaker[Lewis] But even if you could I'd
- speakerbe, I think, very sceptical
- speakerabout it because it does result in this
- speakerSo. You either your
- speakerTo deal with an emergency now, you've got to either find a
- speakerway to divert a source of
- speakermoney somehow that's already in the
- speakersystem to get allocated to this.
- speakerIf your response is going to be anything other than
- speakerrhetorical. OR you have got to try to identify
- speakersome way of raising funds, which is what we try
- speakerand it's not so far
- speakerconspicuously successful in raising a little bit more
- speakeras it goes along
- speakerbut it does appear that the Church's capacity
- speakerand
- speakerwillingness to go in special
- speakerappeals for things is, things other
- speakerthan dramatically visible, actual
- speakerdisasters. [Bauer] Can we go back to
- speakerthe
- speakerbeginning of the
- speakerEmergency Ministry. In a sense what
- speakeryou are saying. This may be putting it negatively, but
- speakeryou are implying that you would have preferred that the Church do
- speakersomething more about the Vietnam War, but under
- speakerthe
- speakercircumstances about all that one could expect
- speakerwas taking on this type of ministerial
- speakerfunction and try to make it an official
- speakerprogram but now. Was it the intention of the people
- speakerbehind the program to do, to be the rallying point for
- speakerthe anti-war movement? Or was that it just become that because of
- speakerthe only
- speakerthing that ran?
- speaker[Lewis] That's still some question. I think it's clear that
- speakerthe commitment of the people who were behind the program
- speakerBill Tilton in particular, who became the director was clearly, strongly
- speakeranti-
- speakerwar at that time.
- speaker[Bauer] Anti Vietnam War. [Lewis] Anti Vietnam War. And I
- speakerwas trying to remember the direction
- speakerofmy own stance on that matter. By sixty-nine, at
- speakerleast, I was
- speakeralso I think in the early part of sixty-
- speakereight it was fair
- speakerto say of myself that I was at least still as concerned about the
- speakertension and
- speakersuffering and disruption that it was causing. and therefore the churches need to deal with people.
- speakerwhatever reasons. I can't remember when
- speakerI quit trying to argue that you got to see both sides at the end to
- speakersay but dammit this is of the devil.
- speakerIt was, it was not the
- speakerintention to design the ministry as a
- speakerrallying point. That was not the case. I think it became pretty much
- speakerthat for two reasons. Partly
- speakerbecause the same structure that was responsible
- speakerfor operating that. That is the Board of Christian
- speakerEducation was also the principal structure trying
- speakerto deal
- speakerwith the other kinds of opposition programs: me as
- speakerthe department head of Church and Society in
- speakerthe Board of Christian Education so that there was a
- speakernatural kind of continuity between
- speakerthe effort. And, they were all seen
- speakercoming out of this one
- speakerplace on the Board. Plus the fact is Tilton was the one who was moving
- speakeraround the country holding
- speakertraining sessions for counselors and so
- speakeron, getting grants and counselor
- speakertraining going and network built upand in touch
- speakerwith the other organisations in
- speakersociety that were dealing with the C.O.'s in Canada and the
- speakerresisters underground
- speakerand that included, of course, Presbyterian laity were concerned
- speakerSo, it came about that the ministry became
- speakerconnected with the antiwar movement, but not by intent,
- speakerbut it is clear that whatever
- speakerelse may have been in anybody's mind, I was
- speakerpersuaded that that kind of program was the only sort
- speakerof institutional
- speakercommitment of any
- speakerconsequence that one could get out of the
- speakerchurch as distinct from a
- speakerpositional commitment. We got, beginning in sixty-nine, we began to.
- speakerSeventy, we began to get fairly
- speakerstrong positional commitments, but that's
- speakerdifferent. [Bauer] That's different, from the program. [Lewis] Institutional response, yeah.
- speaker[Bauer] I guess you could talk about evaluating
- speakerthe effectiveness of the thing in terms of church attitude
- speakerand in terms of the number of people served, the impact of the counseling.
- speakerDo you have any
- speakerreflections on any one of those? [Lewis] We have some
- speakerreports. Now, finding those files, Okay. There
- speakerwas was a wrap up report.
- speakerI believe at the end there was a sizable amount of stuff.
- speakerMy own hunch.
- speakerIt's more than a hunch. By the way I'm got an
- speakerunpublished senior thesis that Bill Galvin [Galvin, E. William]Â did.
- speakerBill is one of the interns at Princeton
- speakerone of the Presbyterian churches involved with the Vietnam War. [Bauer] I'd be interested to see that.
- speaker[Lewis] Yeah. It just occurred to me
- speakerthat
- speakerI think
- speakerit
- speakercould be
- speakerjudged pretty effective on three
- speakergrounds.
- speakerstatistically it did
- speakerdeliver counseling and assistance to a sizeable
- speakernumber of Presbyterian young people and their families.
- speakerI can't give you the numbers. [Bauer] Yeah, but it. [Lewis] But it functioned effectively to
- speakercreate and train a
- speakernetwork. It didn't just say it was going to do it, it
- speakerdid it of draft counselors and draft counseling [Bauer] Yeah. I know we had them
- speakerin Detroit. Yeah. [Lewis] So that it followed through on that, and
- speakerI think it would be fair to
- speakersay that any
- speakerUnited Presbyterian family or young
- speakerperson who wanted assistance from the church
- speakerduring those years probably both
- speakerknew their pastor and where to get
- speakerit. And, they could get
- speakerit if they asked for it. So that is
- speakerfairly high order.
- speakerI believe also that
- speakerit functioned
- speakerto make the church credible
- speakerto a fairly important
- speakergeneration of folk, who were
- speakeralready deep into mistrust of most
- speakerinstitutions. And, the
- speakerchurch may have
- speakerbought an unmeasurable obviously
- speakeramount of time with an important segment of that generation if it
- speakeruses that
- speakertime in an opportunity because it. It really
- speakerdid. And, not only the ones it helped, but
- speakerothers, of that generation who saw the church ready to more,
- speakerparticularly when it reached out to
- speakerCanada and to the to the
- speakerresisters, not just to the CEO'S, but the resisters, the ones who weren't
- speakerregistered. the ones who went underground. And, to see the church and to see the
- speakerGeneral Assembly
- speakeraffirming legitimacy of that kind of
- speakerministry, that kind of
- speakeraction with those people is an important witness.
- speaker[Bauer] As you say that
- speakervery, kind of philosophically, the picture in my mind
- speakerwas when George
- speakerColeman led the march to the middle of the bridge between
- speakerDetroit and Windsor [Canada] and [Lewis] The N.C.C. [Bauer] handed the
- speakermoney and he was a member
- speakerof my staff in
- speakerDetroit, and it hit the
- speakerfan at that point, yeah.
- speaker[Lewis] And, third, I do believe
- speakerthat particularly the whole statement on conscience and war.
- speakerWhat's it called, "War, Peace and Conscience." ["War, Peace and Conscience: Statement adopted by the 181st General Assembly, 1969"] A
- speakerbig study, head long part of that,
- speakerwhich is still widely
- speakerdistributed by the folk at General Assembly
- speakerlevel, functioned to give the church
- speakerfor somewhat of a long time, a relatively
- speakercredible and fairly widely
- speakeraffirmed basis for each of
- speakerevidence about participation in war.
- speakerAnd, had
- speakersizable effect over years to
- speakerto keep the
- speakerchurch from the kind
- speakerof easy descent into
- speakerpatriotic fervor that. Fighting became unpopular in society.
- speakerVietnam I think the struggle with those
- speakerissues and the experience
- speakerof legitimating and funding right out in the
- speakeropen the ministry to people who were breaking the law and having to struggle
- speakerwith issues about why they were,
- speakermakes it infinitely easier
- speakertoday for the folk out there to talk about counseling with
- speakertheir high school kids about their choices in regard to the draft, that has now been
- speakerreinstituted, in other words. The church
- speakergot a kick along the
- speakerway towards its current involvements in peacemaking and things. You can't measure that at all. But, I. I think it had some effect.
- speaker[Bauer] When did. Let's see. Nixon came in in January of sixty-nine.
- speakerThen peace was negotiated
- speakera
- speakerseventy. [Lewis] It hadn't been negotiated by the time he was re-elected
- speakereven. [Bauer] That was
- speakerseventy-two. No.
- speaker[Lewis] And, remember the seventy Assembly was done at the height of the Cambodia
- speakerbombing. Multiple bombings
- speakerIt seemed like every time we'd meet in the
- speakerAssembly, that they'd do some atrocity just so we could do it for. So that it
- speaker[Bauer] I'm trying to put it
- speaker[Lewis] It went up and down, you know.
- speaker[Bauer] What I was trying to get to, like
- speakerseventy, late seventy-one, into seventy-
- speaker-two, and all of that. The antiwar movement
- speakerwas fairly well, was fairly
- speakerwidespread, but this thing had already
- speakerIt already had two and a half years or more under
- speakerway [Lewis] And, by that
- speakertime. Well, let's see, which Assembly was
- speakerit when Heckel [Heckel, C. Willard, UPCUSA, Moderator of 1972 General Assembly] was
- speakerelected at? [Bauer]
- speakerAngela Davis Assembly then. Rochester [Lewis] seventy-one?
- speakerOr was Rochester? I think.
- speakerYeah. Because that's when we had Flock and Hoopes [Hoopes, Townsend "Tim" Walter, II; Under Secretary of the Air Force] from the State Department.
- speakerWell of course Townsend Hoopes was out then. He had been in Kennedy and
- speakerJohnson's administration. And, Flock, from the State Department, argued and
- speakerHeckel, remember at that point, answered the
- speakerquestion about Bernie Stewart on the Vietnam War. [Bauer] Oh, That's
- speakerright. That's right. [Lewis] By saying as a former military
- speakercommander I think
- speakerit's a military disaster. As a professor of constitutional law I believe it to
- speakerbe illegal. As a Christian, I think
- speakerit is immoral. [Bauer] That strength was elected. [Lewis] That
- speakerwas seventy
- speakerI think it was seventy one. Either seventy one there. Or
- speakerseventy-two was the overhaul, wasn't it?
- speakerIt was at one of those two places. It
- speakermay have been Omah in seventy-
- speakertwo, but by that
- speakerpoint
- speakerthe General Assembly's
- speakerdebate had no need or the hope of being pumped
- speakerup. There were plenty of folk, elders, ministers both willing to stand up
- speakeron the floor. And say, I don't care what anybody says I think our country doing something
- speakerwrong
- speakerover there.
- speakerTherefore,
- speakerthe church is being engaged from that point on as simply, as a part
- speakerof the broad
- speakercultural societal resistance to the War.
- speakerIt really had no strong independent role other
- speakerthan caring for its own. so to continue
- speakerthe ministry, I think. [Bauer] Trying to put
- speakertogether in my head as I listen to this
- speakeris that question of whether there is in the life of the church
- speakera necessity for some kind of a
- speakerlatent set of values or beliefs. And, it is clear from what you said in terms of
- speakerthe sixty seven and sixty eight statements that there isn't
- speakera traditional law that was at that point restated. The question
- speakerbecomes operative then at a particular level or in a small group
- speakerof the church. What you've just described is that the antiwar sentiment never
- speakerdid in the church as a
- speakerwhole ever come down on the side of that theological
- speakerground. It was more the general social movement in the church
- speakerin the society
- speakerthat informed the mass response of the church.
- speaker[Lewis] Well. What I meant to say was
- speakerthat there did not seem at that point to me to be any
- speakerneed for special
- speakerorganization or church response.
- speaker[Bauer] right. [Lewis] The society provided adequate avenues
- speakerfor that. But that [Lewis] Emergency at that point,as far as one could
- speakerbe said to exist just had to do still with the church's continuing need
- speakerto minister to the people who were being chewed up by it.
- speaker[Bauer] Right. [Lewis] the church's own people. But,
- speakerI think it's generally
- speakertrue that the
- speakerchurches. Whatever you want to call it, philosophical, moral understanding,
- speakerrarely
- speakerreceives very much
- speakerThat is. I am not sure that it is to any considerable degree autonomous from its society's.
- speakerThat certainly was not
- speakertrue in the race movement. The church was not ahead of society.
- speakerIts theological. I mean some of its General Assembly statments
- speakerit was, but in terms of the church's own standing and when it was to engage this
- speakerissue relates to up there in August sixty-three and Blake says "Late we come,"
- speakerhe was absolutely right.
- speakerI think it was true in the
- speakerWar. The church is a
- speakerconservative institution. But, I don't think
- speaker[Bauer] What you described in terms
- speakerof the beginning of this
- speakerministry was a long way ahead of public sentiment in terms of the War.
- speaker[Lewis] But, it was defined in terms of ministry. [Bauer] Right, bit
- speakerit was still there, but only in
- speakera very small minority of the church was there?
- speakerBut it was there. [Lewis] Well as
- speakerWell
- speakermaybe. A minority willing to minister to its
- speakerown in terms of their, whatever they saw it as, confusion, agony,
- speakersin, whatever. But still
- speakerbe doing. It was not a tiny minority. It was a fairly sizeable group of
- speakerpeople, who said [Bauer] Once the ministry had started. I was thinking before. [Lewis] Getting started [Bauer] right.
- speaker[Lewis] But, you know. Isn't it true, take the approach
- speakerthat the last General Assembly was asked to make by the overture,
- speakerwasn't it from Detroit? which started about the unemployment fund?
- speakerone billion dollars for the employment fund? the
- speakerwhole. Reagan is trashing the whole
- speakereconomy and most of the world with a
- speakercombination of policies
- speakerthat would demand any
- speakersensible social organization in this country to be organizing up
- speakerto the hilt to counter, not just this, that or the other thing, but the
- speakerwhole damn diabolical thrust of what the guy is trying
- speakerto do in the world. But, what we do? We come in with an overture
- speakerthat asked the church to a million dollars to help deal
- speakerwith unemployment. The instinct to deal with
- speakerbig complex and controversial social issues through some avenue
- speakerof service to the
- speakervictims is deeply
- speakerrooted in the church. Some people elevate that to
- speakera doctrine, you know. You get people started there, and then you can lead
- speakerthem in their consciousness is
- speakerraised. You know, and so on. I'm not sure that's true of
- speakermyself. I think it's probably more
- speakertrue that if the
- speakersituation moves along. Because. You know. I don't think our
- speakerpeople are still
- speakerclear for the most part about growing links between the suffering of individuals
- speakerand the big macro policies that are at stake. They can
- speakeralways find a number
- speakerof quite quixotic reasons for
- speakersaying well, you know, that this
- speakerperson had bad luck or wasn't well-prepared or the factory
- speakermoved. Any kind of. Never mind. So I don't.
- speakerI don't think that it is unique.
- speakerThe thing that is
- speakertricky to me of the the trick. The important thing is to try to figure
- speakerout from time to time where the
- speakerchurch can,
- speakerin fact, make a particularly
- speakeruseful institutional entry into the
- speakersituation in a way that's both true to its
- speakerown nature as an
- speakerinstitution, some integrity, but does
- speakerprovide some
- speakerhandle on what's going on.
- speakerSome window that engages people's
- speakerattention about it.
- speakerand that's what I
- speakerthink happened in the Emergency Ministry.
- speakerI think that happened to some
- speakerconsiderable degree in the early days of
- speakerCORAR [Commission on Religion and Race]. That was
- speakera mechanism that provided the church with
- speakerthe
- speakeropportunity to be true to its own conviction.
- speakerbecause it was essentially a response
- speakerto a group of us getting
- speakerto develop in the south. It was nonviolent. It was challenging through direct action a number
- speakerof practices. And people were getting hurt already and needing some
- speakeradvocacy and some support. It lived with us. It met those requirements.
- speakerI mean COCAR [Committee on Church and Race] got sidetracked a few years later.
- speakerless helpful model. So
- speakerthat there's no way you can talk about COCAR in our church now being a response to
- speakercrisis. [Bauer] Yeah. [Lewis] As CORAR clearly was. It was
- speakera
- speakercommitment to put extra institutional resources behind the effort to deal with
- speakera clearly critical need in our
- speakersociety and to provide a means of
- speakermarshalling the church's energies and
- speakerattention and engaging them in that critical
- speakerstruggle. And, what has COCAR
- speakerbecome out of that? [Bauer] Well.
- speaker[Lewis] It ain't doing that, is
- speakerit?
- speaker[Bauer] Before we leave the Vietnam thing, I wanted to ask you, in terms of
- speakersuccess, or you know,
- speakereffectiveness. Do you have any reflection on the pastors generally
- speakeracross the
- speakerchurch at large, because a lot of this. Or most. A lot of it was going on in
- speakerchurches. Some of it wasn't. So, I want to ask you about pastors.
- speakerI want to ask you about ecumenicity and relationships both and.
- speakerabout.
- speaker[Lewis] Well the pastors' attitude was clearly a
- speakerfunction
- speakerof one or two things.
- speakerTheir prior stance in regard to the issues of war and
- speakerpeace. If they were people who were already concerned about
- speakerthese
- speakermatters, preaching about it and so forth. Part of this liberal establishment
- speakeryou know. They tuned into
- speakerthis. Or, it depended up
- speakeron the experience of the C.O.
- speakeror
- speakerresistor attitude and activity
- speakerwithin their
- speakercongregation. If they had had a son
- speakera pastors had. Pastors did of course.
- speakerOr some family or two or three in a church that was
- speakerfairly central to his life. Then they
- speakerwere ready to go and do it and so on.
- speakerThat's what I'm really determined I say because of the early days.
- speakerOtherwise they would cut out
- speakergeneral issues if they were relatively conservative
- speakeror suspicious of it. If they were relatively
- speakeropen liberally
- speakeror tuned to denominational loyalty
- speakermiddle of the road, they would mark it
- speakerdown and say. Well, it is interesting. The church has a new
- speakerministry and be able to say something about it
- speaker[Bauer] I look back on it. And, I really haven't thought about this before, but as I think about
- speakerthe pastors in Detroit, who
- speakerwere in a major sense, split wide apart.
- speakeron all the issues of the crisis, race crises.
- speakerThere was a strange kind
- speakerof sense of the
- speakerusefulness of this small
- speakerbut significant ministry. The people didn't get wrought up
- speakerabout as
- speakermuch as a lot of other things. The antiwar movement was
- speakerone thing. I mean. They were.That was
- speakerThat was as volatile as some of the other things. [Lewis] I think that's a good observation.
- speakerIt. it did
- speakernot result
- speakergenerally well the opposition to it
- speakerthat arose to a vocal and visible level was
- speakerreally
- speakerquite small and fairly
- speakerwell isolated. There was,
- speakerin the early days particularly, there was
- speakersuspicion of it and all. But there was not the kind of
- speakerwidespread still argument and bickering. It was it
- speakerwas isolated and insulated to some
- speakerdegree generally, from a lot, precisely because of its character.
- speakerIt was a ministry. It was oriented to people. It was oriented to helping
- speakerpeople. And the fact that it helped
- speakerthem as they were dealing with
- speakerissues around the Vietnam War was known, but
- speakerthe structure of the approach made it palatable.
- speakerIt is just like in a
- speakerway the overture from a Presbytery raising the question
- speakerabout ordaining homosexuals,
- speakerfinally put the
- speakerquestion of what is homosexuality in a form
- speakerthat the church with some
- speakercare could talk
- speakerabout without blowing itself wide open,
- speakerwithout having the question put in a
- speakerway that made that
- speakeraccessible as an
- speakerinstitutional or pastoral
- speakerconcern. Trying to put it both ways. You couldn't have
- speakerlaid out a task force to study homosexuality in the
- speakerchurch, put out that kind of material,apart from such an occasion.
- speakerJust like you couldn't have laid out in those early
- speakeryears a clear, you know, invective against the War in Vietnam
- speakerstill and
- speakerthat's that's an important insight.
- speakerSome of these matters at
- speakerleast you do have to find angles. That's what. That's
- speakervariation on this thing. The church has to find a way to get at these
- speakerthings that is recognized
- speakersufficiently by its members
- speakeras having integrity within the
- speakerchurch's own