Dean Lewis interviewed by R. W. Bauer, 1983, side 2.

Primary tabs

Download

  • speaker
    [Lewis] Actually
  • speaker
    being deployed by strategies
  • speaker
    that
  • speaker
    this
  • speaker
    whole refugee resettlement and emergency
  • speaker
    services, the Hunger Program, you know,
  • speaker
    the Self Development program.
  • speaker
    You can, you can argue that those
  • speaker
    represent continuing commitments of the church, and sure
  • speaker
    enough, they do. But, also social prison
  • speaker
    history, work with alcoholics. You know you
  • speaker
    can any number of things. You can
  • speaker
    interface work with the community organizations,
  • speaker
    metropolitan development and
  • speaker
    the combination
  • speaker
    of of a relatively
  • speaker
    protected source of institutional
  • speaker
    funding, with
  • speaker
    a program with bureaucratic interest build up
  • speaker
    was has in essence isolated
  • speaker
    a sum of money equal to
  • speaker
    to what
  • speaker
    [Bauer] A third of the
  • speaker
    programs? [Lewis] Oh, more than that. programs. A third at
  • speaker
    least of the Program Agency's total resources
  • speaker
    available, only about twelve and a half million for General Mission. They give us seven and a half million
  • speaker
    They have so many other things to do with it. That really
  • speaker
    isn't capable of being examined in the
  • speaker
    rational priority part of the system and can't
  • speaker
    be
  • speaker
    effectively re-ordered to meet situations that the church
  • speaker
    might want to define as more
  • speaker
    So you got a situation there where
  • speaker
    you either have to find a way. This is what I analyzed back in sixty eight
  • speaker
    already but you either had to find a way to get into one of those systems where money was already
  • speaker
    available
  • speaker
    somehow or operate it on a shoestring.
  • speaker
    Because I had not yet tumbled to the fact then that it
  • speaker
    was possible to expand
  • speaker
    that kitty. I tumbled to that in seventy-five
  • speaker
    when it came time to do hunger funding
  • speaker
    One Great Hour of Sharing. and Du Val [Du Val, William K.] screamed
  • speaker
    You're going to ruin the program and of
  • speaker
    course as I crossed my fingers and believed it
  • speaker
    would result in expansion because it
  • speaker
    already looked
  • speaker
    in the Self-Devlopment of People thing. [Bauer] Yes. [Lewis] that was the
  • speaker
    third interest but it just trippled the fund instead of doubling that because that
  • speaker
    was. i don't think you could do that again. [Bauer] No.
  • speaker
    [Lewis] But even if you could I'd
  • speaker
    be, I think, very sceptical
  • speaker
    about it because it does result in this
  • speaker
    So. You either your
  • speaker
    To deal with an emergency now, you've got to either find a
  • speaker
    way to divert a source of
  • speaker
    money somehow that's already in the
  • speaker
    system to get allocated to this.
  • speaker
    If your response is going to be anything other than
  • speaker
    rhetorical. OR you have got to try to identify
  • speaker
    some way of raising funds, which is what we try
  • speaker
    and it's not so far
  • speaker
    conspicuously successful in raising a little bit more
  • speaker
    as it goes along
  • speaker
    but it does appear that the Church's capacity
  • speaker
    and
  • speaker
    willingness to go in special
  • speaker
    appeals for things is, things other
  • speaker
    than dramatically visible, actual
  • speaker
    disasters. [Bauer] Can we go back to
  • speaker
    the
  • speaker
    beginning of the
  • speaker
    Emergency Ministry. In a sense what
  • speaker
    you are saying. This may be putting it negatively, but
  • speaker
    you are implying that you would have preferred that the Church do
  • speaker
    something more about the Vietnam War, but under
  • speaker
    the
  • speaker
    circumstances about all that one could expect
  • speaker
    was taking on this type of ministerial
  • speaker
    function and try to make it an official
  • speaker
    program but now. Was it the intention of the people
  • speaker
    behind the program to do, to be the rallying point for
  • speaker
    the anti-war movement? Or was that it just become that because of
  • speaker
    the only
  • speaker
    thing that ran?
  • speaker
    [Lewis] That's still some question. I think it's clear that
  • speaker
    the commitment of the people who were behind the program
  • speaker
    Bill Tilton in particular, who became the director was clearly, strongly
  • speaker
    anti-
  • speaker
    war at that time.
  • speaker
    [Bauer] Anti Vietnam War. [Lewis] Anti Vietnam War. And I
  • speaker
    was trying to remember the direction
  • speaker
    ofmy own stance on that matter. By sixty-nine, at
  • speaker
    least, I was
  • speaker
    also I think in the early part of sixty-
  • speaker
    eight it was fair
  • speaker
    to say of myself that I was at least still as concerned about the
  • speaker
    tension and
  • speaker
    suffering and disruption that it was causing. and therefore the churches need to deal with people.
  • speaker
    whatever reasons. I can't remember when
  • speaker
    I quit trying to argue that you got to see both sides at the end to
  • speaker
    say but dammit this is of the devil.
  • speaker
    It was, it was not the
  • speaker
    intention to design the ministry as a
  • speaker
    rallying point. That was not the case. I think it became pretty much
  • speaker
    that for two reasons. Partly
  • speaker
    because the same structure that was responsible
  • speaker
    for operating that. That is the Board of Christian
  • speaker
    Education was also the principal structure trying
  • speaker
    to deal
  • speaker
    with the other kinds of opposition programs: me as
  • speaker
    the department head of Church and Society in
  • speaker
    the Board of Christian Education so that there was a
  • speaker
    natural kind of continuity between
  • speaker
    the effort. And, they were all seen
  • speaker
    coming out of this one
  • speaker
    place on the Board. Plus the fact is Tilton was the one who was moving
  • speaker
    around the country holding
  • speaker
    training sessions for counselors and so
  • speaker
    on, getting grants and counselor
  • speaker
    training going and network built upand in touch
  • speaker
    with the other organisations in
  • speaker
    society that were dealing with the C.O.'s in Canada and the
  • speaker
    resisters underground
  • speaker
    and that included, of course, Presbyterian laity were concerned
  • speaker
    So, it came about that the ministry became
  • speaker
    connected with the antiwar movement, but not by intent,
  • speaker
    but it is clear that whatever
  • speaker
    else may have been in anybody's mind, I was
  • speaker
    persuaded that that kind of program was the only sort
  • speaker
    of institutional
  • speaker
    commitment of any
  • speaker
    consequence that one could get out of the
  • speaker
    church as distinct from a
  • speaker
    positional commitment. We got, beginning in sixty-nine, we began to.
  • speaker
    Seventy, we began to get fairly
  • speaker
    strong positional commitments, but that's
  • speaker
    different. [Bauer] That's different, from the program. [Lewis] Institutional response, yeah.
  • speaker
    [Bauer] I guess you could talk about evaluating
  • speaker
    the effectiveness of the thing in terms of church attitude
  • speaker
    and in terms of the number of people served, the impact of the counseling.
  • speaker
    Do you have any
  • speaker
    reflections on any one of those? [Lewis] We have some
  • speaker
    reports. Now, finding those files, Okay. There
  • speaker
    was was a wrap up report.
  • speaker
    I believe at the end there was a sizable amount of stuff.
  • speaker
    My own hunch.
  • speaker
    It's more than a hunch. By the way I'm got an
  • speaker
    unpublished senior thesis that Bill Galvin [Galvin, E. William] did.
  • speaker
    Bill is one of the interns at Princeton
  • speaker
    one of the Presbyterian churches involved with the Vietnam War. [Bauer] I'd be interested to see that.
  • speaker
    [Lewis] Yeah. It just occurred to me
  • speaker
    that
  • speaker
    I think
  • speaker
    it
  • speaker
    could be
  • speaker
    judged pretty effective on three
  • speaker
    grounds.
  • speaker
    statistically it did
  • speaker
    deliver counseling and assistance to a sizeable
  • speaker
    number of Presbyterian young people and their families.
  • speaker
    I can't give you the numbers. [Bauer] Yeah, but it. [Lewis] But it functioned effectively to
  • speaker
    create and train a
  • speaker
    network. It didn't just say it was going to do it, it
  • speaker
    did it of draft counselors and draft counseling [Bauer] Yeah. I know we had them
  • speaker
    in Detroit. Yeah. [Lewis] So that it followed through on that, and
  • speaker
    I think it would be fair to
  • speaker
    say that any
  • speaker
    United Presbyterian family or young
  • speaker
    person who wanted assistance from the church
  • speaker
    during those years probably both
  • speaker
    knew their pastor and where to get
  • speaker
    it. And, they could get
  • speaker
    it if they asked for it. So that is
  • speaker
    fairly high order.
  • speaker
    I believe also that
  • speaker
    it functioned
  • speaker
    to make the church credible
  • speaker
    to a fairly important
  • speaker
    generation of folk, who were
  • speaker
    already deep into mistrust of most
  • speaker
    institutions. And, the
  • speaker
    church may have
  • speaker
    bought an unmeasurable obviously
  • speaker
    amount of time with an important segment of that generation if it
  • speaker
    uses that
  • speaker
    time in an opportunity because it. It really
  • speaker
    did. And, not only the ones it helped, but
  • speaker
    others, of that generation who saw the church ready to more,
  • speaker
    particularly when it reached out to
  • speaker
    Canada and to the to the
  • speaker
    resisters, not just to the CEO'S, but the resisters, the ones who weren't
  • speaker
    registered. the ones who went underground. And, to see the church and to see the
  • speaker
    General Assembly
  • speaker
    affirming legitimacy of that kind of
  • speaker
    ministry, that kind of
  • speaker
    action with those people is an important witness.
  • speaker
    [Bauer] As you say that
  • speaker
    very, kind of philosophically, the picture in my mind
  • speaker
    was when George
  • speaker
    Coleman led the march to the middle of the bridge between
  • speaker
    Detroit and Windsor [Canada] and [Lewis] The N.C.C. [Bauer] handed the
  • speaker
    money and he was a member
  • speaker
    of my staff in
  • speaker
    Detroit, and it hit the
  • speaker
    fan at that point, yeah.
  • speaker
    [Lewis] And, third, I do believe
  • speaker
    that particularly the whole statement on conscience and war.
  • speaker
    What's it called, "War, Peace and Conscience." ["War, Peace and Conscience: Statement adopted by the 181st General Assembly, 1969"] A
  • speaker
    big study, head long part of that,
  • speaker
    which is still widely
  • speaker
    distributed by the folk at General Assembly
  • speaker
    level, functioned to give the church
  • speaker
    for somewhat of a long time, a relatively
  • speaker
    credible and fairly widely
  • speaker
    affirmed basis for each of
  • speaker
    evidence about participation in war.
  • speaker
    And, had
  • speaker
    sizable effect over years to
  • speaker
    to keep the
  • speaker
    church from the kind
  • speaker
    of easy descent into
  • speaker
    patriotic fervor that. Fighting became unpopular in society.
  • speaker
    Vietnam I think the struggle with those
  • speaker
    issues and the experience
  • speaker
    of legitimating and funding right out in the
  • speaker
    open the ministry to people who were breaking the law and having to struggle
  • speaker
    with issues about why they were,
  • speaker
    makes it infinitely easier
  • speaker
    today for the folk out there to talk about counseling with
  • speaker
    their high school kids about their choices in regard to the draft, that has now been
  • speaker
    reinstituted, in other words. The church
  • speaker
    got a kick along the
  • speaker
    way towards its current involvements in peacemaking and things. You can't measure that at all. But, I. I think it had some effect.
  • speaker
    [Bauer] When did. Let's see. Nixon came in in January of sixty-nine.
  • speaker
    Then peace was negotiated
  • speaker
    a
  • speaker
    seventy. [Lewis] It hadn't been negotiated by the time he was re-elected
  • speaker
    even. [Bauer] That was
  • speaker
    seventy-two. No.
  • speaker
    [Lewis] And, remember the seventy Assembly was done at the height of the Cambodia
  • speaker
    bombing. Multiple bombings
  • speaker
    It seemed like every time we'd meet in the
  • speaker
    Assembly, that they'd do some atrocity just so we could do it for. So that it
  • speaker
    [Bauer] I'm trying to put it
  • speaker
    [Lewis] It went up and down, you know.
  • speaker
    [Bauer] What I was trying to get to, like
  • speaker
    seventy, late seventy-one, into seventy-
  • speaker
    -two, and all of that. The antiwar movement
  • speaker
    was fairly well, was fairly
  • speaker
    widespread, but this thing had already
  • speaker
    It already had two and a half years or more under
  • speaker
    way [Lewis] And, by that
  • speaker
    time. Well, let's see, which Assembly was
  • speaker
    it when Heckel [Heckel, C. Willard, UPCUSA, Moderator of 1972 General Assembly] was
  • speaker
    elected at? [Bauer]
  • speaker
    Angela Davis Assembly then. Rochester [Lewis] seventy-one?
  • speaker
    Or was Rochester? I think.
  • speaker
    Yeah. Because that's when we had Flock and Hoopes [Hoopes, Townsend "Tim" Walter, II; Under Secretary of the Air Force] from the State Department.
  • speaker
    Well of course Townsend Hoopes was out then. He had been in Kennedy and
  • speaker
    Johnson's administration. And, Flock, from the State Department, argued and
  • speaker
    Heckel, remember at that point, answered the
  • speaker
    question about Bernie Stewart on the Vietnam War. [Bauer] Oh, That's
  • speaker
    right. That's right. [Lewis] By saying as a former military
  • speaker
    commander I think
  • speaker
    it's a military disaster. As a professor of constitutional law I believe it to
  • speaker
    be illegal. As a Christian, I think
  • speaker
    it is immoral. [Bauer] That strength was elected. [Lewis] That
  • speaker
    was seventy
  • speaker
    I think it was seventy one. Either seventy one there. Or
  • speaker
    seventy-two was the overhaul, wasn't it?
  • speaker
    It was at one of those two places. It
  • speaker
    may have been Omah in seventy-
  • speaker
    two, but by that
  • speaker
    point
  • speaker
    the General Assembly's
  • speaker
    debate had no need or the hope of being pumped
  • speaker
    up. There were plenty of folk, elders, ministers both willing to stand up
  • speaker
    on the floor. And say, I don't care what anybody says I think our country doing something
  • speaker
    wrong
  • speaker
    over there.
  • speaker
    Therefore,
  • speaker
    the church is being engaged from that point on as simply, as a part
  • speaker
    of the broad
  • speaker
    cultural societal resistance to the War.
  • speaker
    It really had no strong independent role other
  • speaker
    than caring for its own. so to continue
  • speaker
    the ministry, I think. [Bauer] Trying to put
  • speaker
    together in my head as I listen to this
  • speaker
    is that question of whether there is in the life of the church
  • speaker
    a necessity for some kind of a
  • speaker
    latent set of values or beliefs. And, it is clear from what you said in terms of
  • speaker
    the sixty seven and sixty eight statements that there isn't
  • speaker
    a traditional law that was at that point restated. The question
  • speaker
    becomes operative then at a particular level or in a small group
  • speaker
    of the church. What you've just described is that the antiwar sentiment never
  • speaker
    did in the church as a
  • speaker
    whole ever come down on the side of that theological
  • speaker
    ground. It was more the general social movement in the church
  • speaker
    in the society
  • speaker
    that informed the mass response of the church.
  • speaker
    [Lewis] Well. What I meant to say was
  • speaker
    that there did not seem at that point to me to be any
  • speaker
    need for special
  • speaker
    organization or church response.
  • speaker
    [Bauer] right. [Lewis] The society provided adequate avenues
  • speaker
    for that. But that [Lewis] Emergency at that point,as far as one could
  • speaker
    be said to exist just had to do still with the church's continuing need
  • speaker
    to minister to the people who were being chewed up by it.
  • speaker
    [Bauer] Right. [Lewis] the church's own people. But,
  • speaker
    I think it's generally
  • speaker
    true that the
  • speaker
    churches. Whatever you want to call it, philosophical, moral understanding,
  • speaker
    rarely
  • speaker
    receives very much
  • speaker
    That is. I am not sure that it is to any considerable degree autonomous from its society's.
  • speaker
    That certainly was not
  • speaker
    true in the race movement. The church was not ahead of society.
  • speaker
    Its theological. I mean some of its General Assembly statments
  • speaker
    it was, but in terms of the church's own standing and when it was to engage this
  • speaker
    issue relates to up there in August sixty-three and Blake says "Late we come,"
  • speaker
    he was absolutely right.
  • speaker
    I think it was true in the
  • speaker
    War. The church is a
  • speaker
    conservative institution. But, I don't think
  • speaker
    [Bauer] What you described in terms
  • speaker
    of the beginning of this
  • speaker
    ministry was a long way ahead of public sentiment in terms of the War.
  • speaker
    [Lewis] But, it was defined in terms of ministry. [Bauer] Right, bit
  • speaker
    it was still there, but only in
  • speaker
    a very small minority of the church was there?
  • speaker
    But it was there. [Lewis] Well as
  • speaker
    Well
  • speaker
    maybe. A minority willing to minister to its
  • speaker
    own in terms of their, whatever they saw it as, confusion, agony,
  • speaker
    sin, whatever. But still
  • speaker
    be doing. It was not a tiny minority. It was a fairly sizeable group of
  • speaker
    people, who said [Bauer] Once the ministry had started. I was thinking before. [Lewis] Getting started [Bauer] right.
  • speaker
    [Lewis] But, you know. Isn't it true, take the approach
  • speaker
    that the last General Assembly was asked to make by the overture,
  • speaker
    wasn't it from Detroit? which started about the unemployment fund?
  • speaker
    one billion dollars for the employment fund? the
  • speaker
    whole. Reagan is trashing the whole
  • speaker
    economy and most of the world with a
  • speaker
    combination of policies
  • speaker
    that would demand any
  • speaker
    sensible social organization in this country to be organizing up
  • speaker
    to the hilt to counter, not just this, that or the other thing, but the
  • speaker
    whole damn diabolical thrust of what the guy is trying
  • speaker
    to do in the world. But, what we do? We come in with an overture
  • speaker
    that asked the church to a million dollars to help deal
  • speaker
    with unemployment. The instinct to deal with
  • speaker
    big complex and controversial social issues through some avenue
  • speaker
    of service to the
  • speaker
    victims is deeply
  • speaker
    rooted in the church. Some people elevate that to
  • speaker
    a doctrine, you know. You get people started there, and then you can lead
  • speaker
    them in their consciousness is
  • speaker
    raised. You know, and so on. I'm not sure that's true of
  • speaker
    myself. I think it's probably more
  • speaker
    true that if the
  • speaker
    situation moves along. Because. You know. I don't think our
  • speaker
    people are still
  • speaker
    clear for the most part about growing links between the suffering of individuals
  • speaker
    and the big macro policies that are at stake. They can
  • speaker
    always find a number
  • speaker
    of quite quixotic reasons for
  • speaker
    saying well, you know, that this
  • speaker
    person had bad luck or wasn't well-prepared or the factory
  • speaker
    moved. Any kind of. Never mind. So I don't.
  • speaker
    I don't think that it is unique.
  • speaker
    The thing that is
  • speaker
    tricky to me of the the trick. The important thing is to try to figure
  • speaker
    out from time to time where the
  • speaker
    church can,
  • speaker
    in fact, make a particularly
  • speaker
    useful institutional entry into the
  • speaker
    situation in a way that's both true to its
  • speaker
    own nature as an
  • speaker
    institution, some integrity, but does
  • speaker
    provide some
  • speaker
    handle on what's going on.
  • speaker
    Some window that engages people's
  • speaker
    attention about it.
  • speaker
    and that's what I
  • speaker
    think happened in the Emergency Ministry.
  • speaker
    I think that happened to some
  • speaker
    considerable degree in the early days of
  • speaker
    CORAR [Commission on Religion and Race]. That was
  • speaker
    a mechanism that provided the church with
  • speaker
    the
  • speaker
    opportunity to be true to its own conviction.
  • speaker
    because it was essentially a response
  • speaker
    to a group of us getting
  • speaker
    to develop in the south. It was nonviolent. It was challenging through direct action a number
  • speaker
    of practices. And people were getting hurt already and needing some
  • speaker
    advocacy and some support. It lived with us. It met those requirements.
  • speaker
    I mean COCAR [Committee on Church and Race] got sidetracked a few years later.
  • speaker
    less helpful model. So
  • speaker
    that there's no way you can talk about COCAR in our church now being a response to
  • speaker
    crisis. [Bauer] Yeah. [Lewis] As CORAR clearly was. It was
  • speaker
    a
  • speaker
    commitment to put extra institutional resources behind the effort to deal with
  • speaker
    a clearly critical need in our
  • speaker
    society and to provide a means of
  • speaker
    marshalling the church's energies and
  • speaker
    attention and engaging them in that critical
  • speaker
    struggle. And, what has COCAR
  • speaker
    become out of that? [Bauer] Well.
  • speaker
    [Lewis] It ain't doing that, is
  • speaker
    it?
  • speaker
    [Bauer] Before we leave the Vietnam thing, I wanted to ask you, in terms of
  • speaker
    success, or you know,
  • speaker
    effectiveness. Do you have any reflection on the pastors generally
  • speaker
    across the
  • speaker
    church at large, because a lot of this. Or most. A lot of it was going on in
  • speaker
    churches. Some of it wasn't. So, I want to ask you about pastors.
  • speaker
    I want to ask you about ecumenicity and relationships both and.
  • speaker
    about.
  • speaker
    [Lewis] Well the pastors' attitude was clearly a
  • speaker
    function
  • speaker
    of one or two things.
  • speaker
    Their prior stance in regard to the issues of war and
  • speaker
    peace. If they were people who were already concerned about
  • speaker
    these
  • speaker
    matters, preaching about it and so forth. Part of this liberal establishment
  • speaker
    you know. They tuned into
  • speaker
    this. Or, it depended up
  • speaker
    on the experience of the C.O.
  • speaker
    or
  • speaker
    resistor attitude and activity
  • speaker
    within their
  • speaker
    congregation. If they had had a son
  • speaker
    a pastors had. Pastors did of course.
  • speaker
    Or some family or two or three in a church that was
  • speaker
    fairly central to his life. Then they
  • speaker
    were ready to go and do it and so on.
  • speaker
    That's what I'm really determined I say because of the early days.
  • speaker
    Otherwise they would cut out
  • speaker
    general issues if they were relatively conservative
  • speaker
    or suspicious of it. If they were relatively
  • speaker
    open liberally
  • speaker
    or tuned to denominational loyalty
  • speaker
    middle of the road, they would mark it
  • speaker
    down and say. Well, it is interesting. The church has a new
  • speaker
    ministry and be able to say something about it
  • speaker
    [Bauer] I look back on it. And, I really haven't thought about this before, but as I think about
  • speaker
    the pastors in Detroit, who
  • speaker
    were in a major sense, split wide apart.
  • speaker
    on all the issues of the crisis, race crises.
  • speaker
    There was a strange kind
  • speaker
    of sense of the
  • speaker
    usefulness of this small
  • speaker
    but significant ministry. The people didn't get wrought up
  • speaker
    about as
  • speaker
    much as a lot of other things. The antiwar movement was
  • speaker
    one thing. I mean. They were.That was
  • speaker
    That was as volatile as some of the other things. [Lewis] I think that's a good observation.
  • speaker
    It. it did
  • speaker
    not result
  • speaker
    generally well the opposition to it
  • speaker
    that arose to a vocal and visible level was
  • speaker
    really
  • speaker
    quite small and fairly
  • speaker
    well isolated. There was,
  • speaker
    in the early days particularly, there was
  • speaker
    suspicion of it and all. But there was not the kind of
  • speaker
    widespread still argument and bickering. It was it
  • speaker
    was isolated and insulated to some
  • speaker
    degree generally, from a lot, precisely because of its character.
  • speaker
    It was a ministry. It was oriented to people. It was oriented to helping
  • speaker
    people. And the fact that it helped
  • speaker
    them as they were dealing with
  • speaker
    issues around the Vietnam War was known, but
  • speaker
    the structure of the approach made it palatable.
  • speaker
    It is just like in a
  • speaker
    way the overture from a Presbytery raising the question
  • speaker
    about ordaining homosexuals,
  • speaker
    finally put the
  • speaker
    question of what is homosexuality in a form
  • speaker
    that the church with some
  • speaker
    care could talk
  • speaker
    about without blowing itself wide open,
  • speaker
    without having the question put in a
  • speaker
    way that made that
  • speaker
    accessible as an
  • speaker
    institutional or pastoral
  • speaker
    concern. Trying to put it both ways. You couldn't have
  • speaker
    laid out a task force to study homosexuality in the
  • speaker
    church, put out that kind of material,apart from such an occasion.
  • speaker
    Just like you couldn't have laid out in those early
  • speaker
    years a clear, you know, invective against the War in Vietnam
  • speaker
    still and
  • speaker
    that's that's an important insight.
  • speaker
    Some of these matters at
  • speaker
    least you do have to find angles. That's what. That's
  • speaker
    variation on this thing. The church has to find a way to get at these
  • speaker
    things that is recognized
  • speaker
    sufficiently by its members
  • speaker
    as having integrity within the
  • speaker
    church's own

Bookmark

BookBags: