Dean Lewis interviewed by R. W. Bauer, 1983, side 3.

Primary tabs

Download

  • speaker
    [Lewis] Engaged people around a lot of questions in terms they could, if not be comfortable with
  • speaker
    at least. Now what were the other things that you
  • speaker
    I guess you know Detroit was
  • speaker
    probably instinctively the thing for that
  • speaker
    for me the employment question. And, of course,
  • speaker
    Phil Newell [Newell, Philip Rutherford, Jr.] , was trying to build
  • speaker
    as much of his economic justice issue strategy around the
  • speaker
    plant closing business [Bauer] Yes.
  • speaker
    [Lewis] organizing protests around that business. [Bauer] that's not a bad idea.
  • speaker
    [Lewis] Although it was kind of a hard
  • speaker
    way to get the public policy.
  • speaker
    at least, that's the instinct--to find a place within a community that has had a plant close.
  • speaker
    And, you certainly have a way of talking to the
  • speaker
    church about its relation to the
  • speaker
    community and to a set of issues that you don't have
  • speaker
    if you just come into a church generally and ask for its study of its structural economic change.
  • speaker
    [Bauer] You'd get nowhere.] [Lewis] That was that.
  • speaker
    [Bauer] You are also contrasting. You started to do
  • speaker
    that when you talked about the early days of CORAR.
  • speaker
    You're
  • speaker
    also contrasting the style of the Social Education and Action approach with more what overt sensitive to the church? Maybe
  • speaker
    the style of National Missions developed? [Lewis] Well. I think there
  • speaker
    was sometimes the National Missions earlier style was, let's say, a kind of
  • speaker
    "Let's get it done. Get the
  • speaker
    church committed." And, if they commit themselves to
  • speaker
    more than they understand, that's fine.
  • speaker
    I'm not sure whether it
  • speaker
    was the old S.E.A. [Department of Social Education and Action] I guess it has been. Yes, it always has
  • speaker
    roots in education. [Bauer] And, it changed people's minds of. [Lewis] In the efficacy
  • speaker
    of reasoned discourse and they thought that, you know, and all kinds of stuff.
  • speaker
    So that there probably
  • speaker
    is or
  • speaker
    was. I don't know there is of either style
  • speaker
    probably any more,
  • speaker
    but there is
  • speaker
    probably
  • speaker
    at the heart of the, what I
  • speaker
    would call the messianic instinct, whatever you want to call it
  • speaker
    evangelistic or educational instinct.
  • speaker
    There was a desire to have people understand and commit themselves
  • speaker
    to a point of view, and the activity or the program
  • speaker
    or policy were to be designed to be done in a way
  • speaker
    that commends assent and support.
  • speaker
    Not simply
  • speaker
    legislates it.
  • speaker
    I may say that, not only
  • speaker
    because it is a deep personal conviction of my own, but it does seem to me to have a stylistic reflection. The one I am thoroughly persuaded on a
  • speaker
    voluntary basis in the church. Our survival, as well as our effectiveness, does not rest upon legislative jargon of General
  • speaker
    Assembly. It rests
  • speaker
    really rests upon persuading constituencies, persuading them enough
  • speaker
    and getting a large enough
  • speaker
    percentage and to a deep enough degree that supports the legislative. It may take some time to do that. Sit around and wait. Assure that everybody is
  • speaker
    going to get through, but ultimately, the institution that depends upon
  • speaker
    voluntary commitments and support cannot survive if it does not have it. [Bauer] The reason that I bring it up is
  • speaker
    starkly, one of the reasons is that some of Don's recent interviews, folks who are now at retirement age or past it, have nothing to lose to speak with,
  • speaker
    . . . which we. [Lewis] We have other ones. [Bauer] Well. Some of
  • speaker
    gotten deployed of all those naming it. And others have said, I will not say who I mean, but they mean to figure out which it was of the six or eight people
  • speaker
    the critical question from those folks who
  • speaker
    many would consider liberal leaders of the previous generation was
  • speaker
    the degree to
  • speaker
    which they took decisions and did not take the church seriously.
  • speaker
    and, in a sense, violated the church.
  • speaker
    [Lewis] And, they are asking this question about themself?
  • speaker
    [Bauer] I don't know. About some of their colleagues. Some of their successors. It's real hostility.
  • speaker
    Something that I didn't really expect. In other words, rather
  • speaker
    than looking at some of that stuff as kind of the glory days, as a tremendous number of our colleagues do, those folks . . . as something we may
  • speaker
    recover from in another generation. [Lewis] Well, I would be interested to hear. . . . [Bauer]I reflected with Don and Don reflected with me.
  • speaker
    [Lewis] Is he talking principally about attitudes toward Board of National Missions?
  • speaker
    I think there is some truth probably in that.
  • speaker
    I don't think it was cynical. There is a corollary added to the C.O.E.M.A.R. [Commission on Ecumenical Mission and Relations], however, that was different. But,
  • speaker
    just as disastrous in the long run, I think.
  • speaker
    and I do believe this has affected
  • speaker
    the Program Agency's general approach to the church. The Program Agency is objective observer
  • speaker
    to [Bauer] C.O.E.M.A.R. Right. [Lewis] Had its levels, and you mentioned
  • speaker
    For COEMAR, which was
  • speaker
    really
  • speaker
    still the Board of Foreign Missions through
  • speaker
    much of its life although it was trying to be something. other than COEMAR
  • speaker
    The mission of the
  • speaker
    church as overseas. The
  • speaker
    Church in the United
  • speaker
    States existed to support
  • speaker
    mission. It existed to send people
  • speaker
    out for mission. Things like that.
  • speaker
    So that the whole attitude towards the church
  • speaker
    in the United States was not as contemptuous as I hear you say some people in
  • speaker
    the Board of National Missions may have had about it. I can see why. I have heard
  • speaker
    some of those things as well. But, in the final
  • speaker
    analysis, was every bit
  • speaker
    as destructive, I think, because it viewed the church cynically, simply as a pocket.
  • speaker
    a source of money to support
  • speaker
    mission, and not
  • speaker
    really as a partner in mission, doer of mission with a vocation
  • speaker
    of mission. [Bauer] right. [Lewis] The church in
  • speaker
    mission. It was the church supporting mission. So that, in a different
  • speaker
    way, COEMAR never took the church in the US seriously,
  • speaker
    except as a place to get money. In
  • speaker
    a way, I suspect underneath this criticism, . . . is the same reality.
  • speaker
    The church is a place to go
  • speaker
    get money to do what you want to
  • speaker
    do and
  • speaker
    necessary
  • speaker
    policy support when you have to. Otherwise you
  • speaker
    [Bauer] And, at its worst, in a sense, to not
  • speaker
    inform the church or make it clear what you are doing. [Lewis] COEMAR has played this game to the hilt.
  • speaker
    COEMAR, well one of the. I remember
  • speaker
    one of the. Heck, I went down to South America
  • speaker
    and came back with all this good stuff. And, had the
  • speaker
    temerity to speak in a meeting that they had called up in 475 [475 Riverside Drive] to hear this wierd Church and Society type, that spent his own money to go
  • speaker
    down to South America and hadn't been sent by COEMAR, which made them suspicious
  • speaker
    of it in the first place. [Bauer] Yes. [Lewis] of course. And, gave them some of my impressions of this
  • speaker
    pitiful representation of the Reformed faith in Colombia. A church of twelve hundred people, nine hundred
  • speaker
    of whom worked for the God damn schools that we had built down there. You know, practically
  • speaker
    and rent by schism and dominated
  • speaker
    by a fundamentalist piety that you wouldn't believe, you know. And this is
  • speaker
    proud of the
  • speaker
    fact that they are
  • speaker
    educating, you know, the elite of this
  • speaker
    country, the top five pecent of the country's leaders send their children here
  • speaker
    to our
  • speaker
    Protestant schools. God, we are
  • speaker
    turning out little dictators and petty bourgeois
  • speaker
    and the rest all over the place and we're proud of it. I remember I turned to Bill Somplatsky-Jarman . . . light shining for a hundred years
  • speaker
    Here in the midst of a dark whole, you know,
  • speaker
    and all that kind of And, when I found out that some of missionaries were . . .
  • speaker
    the attitudes of the worst kind of paternalism toward the people they were trying
  • speaker
    You're right. In both instincts, there
  • speaker
    is a. For different
  • speaker
    reasons, you know, it a conspiracy to not tell the folk who are the church, and
  • speaker
    for the same reasons that ruined it. If we do it, they won't give us
  • speaker
    the money. [Bauer] Don challenged one of the people we are talking to about missionary compensation. The guy finally did admit.
  • speaker
    I would think [Lewis] That still comes out once in a while. There was a big article in Monday Morning
  • speaker
    not long ago over missionaries. They all get their
  • speaker
    housing paid. They all get their education supplements for their kids
  • speaker
    in college, you know. [Bauer] The thing that really opened my eyes
  • speaker
    the first year I went visited Geneva . . . distributing money to all these projects at the World Council. When I found out the first time minister . . .
  • speaker
    [Lewis] Well. Vernon Smith is [Smith, W. H. Vernon] [Bauer] Vernon Smith? Yeah?
  • speaker
    They just sat down like you or I are doing, and going down the list. Well, put five hundred in that one.
  • speaker
    [Lewis] Yeah.
  • speaker
    I was I was
  • speaker
    shocked and still am when I see.
  • speaker
    What is even
  • speaker
    worse is to watch the video
  • speaker
    and bureaucratic pretense with which these staff people go
  • speaker
    about the task of deciding
  • speaker
    who gets $500 and who gets $700, something like that. But you know this already. And, a reminder of how an
  • speaker
    institution goes about the strategic tasks of trying to identify its priorities, prioritize its resources and so on.
  • speaker
    a task that is necessary to do.
  • speaker
    You may not learn all that much out of the past, what guides the church
  • speaker
    will, You can use
  • speaker
    that so as a way of saying.
  • speaker
    The institution really wants to be able to do this sort of thing. Here is the project.
  • speaker
    The capacities it has to have
  • speaker
    in terms of leadership, in terms of a coherent planning.
  • speaker
    in terms of a
  • speaker
    building to recognize and legitimate. I think legitimization is one of the issues
  • speaker
    I don't know how that happens. It happens.
  • speaker
    It happens in various ways. Somebody has got to recognize that is going on and take the responsibility
  • speaker
    to manage the institution's process of
  • speaker
    saying "Yes." got to see that as a priority.
  • speaker
    begin to do something about it or
  • speaker
    so I suppose if there's any value to it at
  • speaker
    all, and it is questionable at times
  • speaker
    when the institution is up for grabs, is to
  • speaker
    lay something in that is an
  • speaker
    exercise in how an institution ought to conduct itself. How to
  • speaker
    manage its
  • speaker
    resources, the allocation of its . . .
  • speaker
    By the way, it. I thought the other day, there was a one
  • speaker
    segment of this. Guess who is responsible for it all are you
  • speaker
    to identify in the present
  • speaker
    programs criteria for allocation where [Bauer] Chuck sent me a whole packet of that stuff.
  • speaker
    [Lewis] Are you going to? [Bauer] Somehow [Lewis] Analyze it. [Bauer] Look at it
  • speaker
    and see what it is. It is a real hodgepodge of
  • speaker
    [Bauer] Oh, boy. I went through it. [Lewis] I figured the best thing to do maybe was
  • speaker
    to put a questionnaire out, but if he hasn't done that. It is a hodgepodge. You would have to pull out each one.
  • speaker
    If he has sent you the official
  • speaker
    criteria, you ought to be able to pull out from each one
  • speaker
    anything that says anything that can be
  • speaker
    explained as a potential
  • speaker
    flexible response to criticism. [Bauer] Yeah. [Lewis] I guess all of them have some
  • speaker
    [Bauer] always some. interesting that COWAC
  • speaker
    officially said they were no longer going to do that, which I could understand.
  • speaker
    [Lewis] Yeah. They are not using theirs for
  • speaker
    program grants. They are using it for . . . [Bauer] That's right.
  • speaker
    [Lewis] which is probably . . . [Bauer] After a few years . . .
  • speaker
    [Lewis] I don't suppose you . . . You could almost call COWAC
  • speaker
    response to a . . . {bauer] right. [Lewis] It is their response to it. [Bauer] Absolutely. [Lewis] Never reached the . . .
  • speaker
    [Lewis] We are going to hell. I guess you know we are going to
  • speaker
    have a conference call on Wednesday to validate the invitees to . . .
  • speaker
    Gail would know. She's

Bookmark

BookBags: